hdennis
Re:Resumes suck for hiring engineers
on Wednesday December 03, 2014 @11:13AM (#8694468)
Thank you for the link, it was very informative.
The two main points in the blog stated that an "enterprisey" developer may not be a good fit in a startup (change in development pace, responsibilities, etc.) and that they may use languages unpopular in a startup environment (Java and .Net are called out in the post).
I'm interested to see if there are other posts that echo this sentiment, aside from the OP, because now I have a fear of being "too enterprisey."
Re:Resumes suck for hiring engineers
on Wednesday December 03, 2014 @08:39AM (#8693637)
In the part of the article that lists "Rejection Reasons" one rejection type is "Too Enterprisey". Could someone please clear up what that means for me?
Re:Ask HN: What's your speciality, and what's your "FizzBuzz" equivalent?
on Thursday January 02, 2014 @12:53PM (#7000924)
Instead of the Left Outer Join, couldn't you also make it an Inner Join to S.BOOK_ID? The question, if I read it correctly, only requires you to return sales in Nov 2013. If there is no data for a book_id, you want to exclude it from your returned data, no?
Re:Ask HN: What's your speciality, and what's your "FizzBuzz" equivalent?
on Thursday January 02, 2014 @11:39AM (#7000433)
Jumping onto this chain, I'd also like to take a stab at a sanitized version of your test. We often have to reverse engineer our Client's existing reports when creating new BI reports for them in Cognos, and I'm curious to see how challenging your 3rd and 4th problem sets are.