havefunwiththat

For that kind of money, you could build a new moon. I don't see anything positive about this kind of loss. If anything, it sounds like questionable accounting to reduce the cost of other profits.

Same question. As far as I know, it's a pretty active project. Did the author mean the jump from v. 0.5 to v. 1.0? That had some breaking changes, but that was expected.

If this was intended to be a troll post, it was very successful.

What you are advocating is, essentially, linguistic and cultural genocide. It's an appalling point of view.

In all seriousness, I would suggest you learn another language, or maybe several, and then revisit your perspective.

Is "discriminant" a word now? I thought performant had pretty much exhausted the possibilities.

Anti-smoking campaigns were offensive and tiring in the 80s. And whoever brought up pigouvian taxation needs a swift slap upside the head.