h4nkoslo
Looking at fiscal inflows and outflows isn't the benchmark of who gains from a relationship and whether it is positive-sum.
http://askakorean.blogspot.com/2016/10/the-irrational-downfa...
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/10/29/499864915/...
http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/76...
https://medium.com/@thepenningtonlens/the-south-korean-puppe...
It's an interesting idea, wouldn't you say? What are the effects of ensuring Sudan or wherever is unable to maintain a functional local elite? Are they good or bad, on balance? If we strip-mine all of their potentially capable administrators, do we have an obligation to administer their state for them, or just airdrop rice every couple years, or what?
The idea that states and people have reciprocal obligations beyond Maximum GDP isn't exactly novel.
It's also probably not fantastic for the United States to be strip mining the entire >130 IQ population of eg Sudan and packing them into SF/NY/DC to work on ad optimization when they're desperately needed by their own people; setting up infrastructure to work remotely is a great first step to eliminating the brain drain problem period.
Also note that in modern militaries, the ratio of behind-the-lines support troops to front-line trigger pullers is absurdly high. Depending on the country, you can end up with conscripts e.g. running the vehicle pool and doing logistics while the core infantry is essential volunteer.
Oddly the "threat" is essentially that you might become ritually unclean by proximity to such content.
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9f67/21bf5954d1129d0212bc4f...
http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/jour...
The "great filter" hypothesis is essentially that the rarity of intelligent life has to be explained by some parameter of the Drake equation, and that whatever the "small" parameter is is either in our past or in our future.
If the "great filter" is the rarity of habitable worlds, then clearly we don't need to fear it, since we already found one. But if habitable worlds aren't rare, then it's more likely it lies in our future (e.g. global thermonuclear war, plague, difficulty of space travel, etc).
Thus things like discovery of exoplanets, bacteria on mars, etc should make us rather concerned.
Somehow one faction has an inalienable right to compel speech from its ideological opponents out of pure spite, because sacred principles of antidiscrimination or whatever, but when it comes to giving a speech by express invitation, having raised the necessary funds for security etc, we are maximally minimalist about what a government institution has to allow.
http://www.nbcnews.com/health/sexual-health/3-common-stds-be...
https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/2016/gonorrhea-treatmen...
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/26/opinion/sunday/artificial...
https://www.propublica.org/article/breaking-the-black-box-ho...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2016/09/19/amazon-echo...
Property developers (along with car dealerships) are by far the strongest advocacy groups in many areas. It's not totally surprising that they've managed to capture the local government and push them towards counterproductive development that ends up being a massive subsidy from the taxpayers.
http://www.floridabulldog.org/2016/06/u-s-attorneys-office-f...
http://www.mintpressnews.com/fbi-planted-bugs-california-cou...
When caught they feign a mixture of complete denial, ignorance, and "I didn't know it was illegal", and they are approximately never held personally responsible by judges.