guyprovost
Re:Why Microsoft is turning into an open-source company
on Sunday June 12, 2016 @10:00AM (#11888111)
Those comments really doesn't surprise me.... Armchair CIO
Re:Signs of Liquid Water Found on Surface of Mars, Study Says
on Tuesday September 29, 2015 @06:50AM (#10295469)
Condescension on HN??!? I guess it's the way those boards all end up. People give their two cents on things they often doesn't research about, armchairs critics on work done by proven researchers. Kinda depressing though because lot's of brilliant people work these things out and we end up with BS comments like these ones instead of some deserved "Wow".
Re:Why C# Is Not My Favorite Programming Language
on Monday September 28, 2015 @06:42AM (#10289725)
Yep... Feel the same here. I guess that we suck!
Re:A week without Google
on Monday May 18, 2015 @08:17AM (#9563953)
Strange alternatives at times... What was the real purpose of the experiment ?
Re:Please stop sending me your shitty Word documents – Coding 2 Learn
on Sunday May 11, 2014 @07:37AM (#7728418)
You said it pal... Kinda sad!
Re:Levinux – A Tiny Version of Linux for Education
on Sunday April 20, 2014 @07:17AM (#7616472)
This absolutly got my attention, going to check for sure. I'm older, and when I was in school we learn OS with Minix, a port of UNIX on the 8086 architecture. But this is so much more!
Re:Hacking Math Homework
on Sunday April 20, 2014 @07:13AM (#7616467)
Wow, impressive and effectively a fun way to really learn. This is also a pretty good resume to show your futur employers. Refreshing!
Re:I’ve Sent This Over 100 Times to Recruiters looking for .Net devs
on Thursday April 10, 2014 @06:23AM (#7565096)
That, my friend is well said. Agreed!
Re:Building and modifying Linux Kernel with Visual Studio
on Tuesday March 25, 2014 @06:24PM (#7469650)
Jeez.... Why being so religious about technology ? It's only "stuff"
Re:If DOS is single-tasking, how was multitasking possible in Windows 95?
on Monday March 10, 2014 @07:07AM (#7372294)
Using Windows 3.x as the example OS would have been a more sensible choice then 95. Windows 95 is way more than a "wrap per" over DOS"! Windows 3.x had way more dependency with DOS than Windows 95 had! Windows 3.x had to offer a "collaborative" way of doing multitasking, each task had to yield to the OS in order for it to Check what any other task had to process in it's message loop, if you wanted to freeze the OS all you had to do was to not call the yield function. Windows 95 supported a preemptive scheme that wasn't there before Back then (kinda like NT did support).