gur48
Several personal insults and as for evidence, a single "Long Island woman claims" allegation from ten years ago. Plus a political derangement twist - how exciting!
It is fascinating how insecure a person like you is capable of being degraded to by the same systems you so vehemently decry. It's analogous to being afraid of everyone on the street because they might have a black belt in martial arts.
The tone-deafness of this comment, which precedes a lengthly diatribe of essential phone features malfunctioning, is something to behold.
> It can be utterly nerve wracking when it glitches just when you depend on it.
This is not "freedom" - it is dependence - which is the polar opposite.
> Your "anonymized" cell phone GPS data can be used pretty easily to determine when you're not home for purposes of burglary.
Please - PLEASE - find me ONE example of a home burglary occuring under these circumstances.
> Your purchasing habits could cause you to become a prime suspect for a terrorist who used those same items in your area for a recent attack, like if your wife was buying a pressure cooker while you were buying backpacks for your kids doing back to school shopping.
This is just beyond nuts. Stop watching so much television, it's not good for your mental health.
"Should" - based on what legal or even rational basis? Or just your personal and subjective "feelings"?
It may just as well mean more capable audits to detect lost/compromised keys.
The article also says nothing of certificate validity periods, which are critical to their lifecycle and analysis.
The conclusion that humans degrade information security is true but ultimately removed from the reality of operating a business.
Try traveling with a concealed firearm across state lines. Or telling a K-9 police officer they can't search your car after the dog has alerted. Or use your free speech privilege to spread alleged vitriol.
There's no such thing as "rights" - only what individuals can defend in the current place and time they're in.