griffel

Wait... You're Christian!? And you support this?

Oh dear. Your jewish overlords must be so proud of your sociopathic evangelism of whoredom and baby murder.

>It is misogyny that prevents women from being in these positions.

Malcolm, it's not 2010 anymore buddy. This isn't it. You're not even going to bait anyone with this shit nowadays.

You can save even more bandwidth by not commenting at all. Many will skip past your comment anyway. If it's not even worth the author's time bothering with basic grammar, is it worth anyone else's time reading it?

Your Shift key is broken.

1. Don't pretend that rape is the reason in any significant proportion of abortions. Anyway, as I said earlier, I support abortion in such cases. This is not what we're discussing.

2. Don't pretend that historic abortion practices were anywhere close in scale and shamelessness to the very proud and public industrial slaughter that we see today. As I said earlier, if abortions came with appropriate repercussions to ensure it won't be necessary again (lifestyle counselling, community obligations, celibacy commitment or sterilisation, social restrictions, etc) then it would be far less common and far more acceptable, in my view.

3. If you actually want to convince anyone, you need to be careful with the 'compassion' angle. Assume the other person is not evil. I know it's hard, I'm struggling too (I'm sure you can see the obvious angle: someone claiming to be compassionate while facilitating the proliferation and ease of the practice of mincing up unborn babies, leaving millions of young women with terrible stains on their souls). It's not helpful.

>is it really compassionate to punish people who made mistakes?

Yes. Otherwise you get more and more mistakes. You can have a few happy surprises or you can have an epidemic of baby slaughter.

Nobody is forcing anyone to have an unintentional pregnancy. What an unusual and manipulative way to frame the consequences of one's actions.

Humanity was just fine for millennia before "women's rights" recently came to mean being able to shamelessly waltz into a clinic to mince up the result of her most recent drunken night with a deadbeat stranger. I promise you women will be fine without abortions-on-tap.

By making abortions accessible, you make abortions necessary. The opposite is also true - and society reaps the benefits of a more responsible population without the crushing guilt and remorse of this degeneracy on their conscience.

I have bad news for you if you think abortions involve careful extraction of the intact fetus... Start with the infamous account from the practitioner who boasted of her novel technique that begins with cutting the baby's vocal cords to muffle its screams.

I think we would be better off if people experienced the consequences of their actions. If abortion was at least difficult to access, and came with some form of compulsory safe-sex counselling or commitment, then its greatly lowered frequency would be a lot more tolerable. I'm afraid that we have normalised the practice such that many seem to believe it has no stigma at all. It is sufficiently 'routine' to affect sexual behaviours (ie. promoting promiscuity).

No issues with abortion in rape rape cases. Also for medical issues. I'm really not that passionate about it. I'm not at all religious but when I see crowds of women cheering abortion or serious political candidates making this a priority issue, I can't help but think of one word: demonic. The modern 'Weimar' West's obsession with this depraved act is spiritually wrong.