gonnano

emotions are like fingerprint's, its not likely that two people will have the same, if you ever meet someone who likes exactly what you like, all cozy like, then most probably their kissing your ass to manipulate you for something, but look into the fingerprint's, in whatever dimension, where the mani fold's lie, there are dead tone's , for example my dead area is hate so I have none, I can get angry but without the hate to fuel my indiscretions they don't have enough energy to arrive past a muon bus stop, some peeps dead areas are love, problem is that when making a judgement we have only one finger mark to measure it off against, which is relative and subjective, but everyone from Freud to Schopenhauer has imposed their subjective view as an objective one by using domination tactics and coke, they set it up to never be properly be argued against, and were unaware what harm they were doing, really to get to the nut of it all and get a good reach around to shove the wrench in the right direction, you would need someone someone who had a few different fingerprints, a different manifold on each digit, and obviously someone who understood that although monopoly might be the dominate game in town, it is by no means the best or most entertaining by a far mark, someone who understands not only that there are other games but and also understands the difference's between the rules and appreciates those nuance's

Bryan Sykesan, An Oxford geneticist claimed all Europeans came from 7 females he called the 7 daughters of Eve, although he wasn't always right in his assumption's

IsaKissTheRain on Reddit commented:

8h There are multiple videos, from different angles. I also ran two of them through some software made for detecting artefacts of CGI. Nothing popped up.

The dialogue, since I understand Mandarin, also matches up and seems very genuine. -----------

Pitter patter.

Once I seen " Shouts of laughter, tears of joy, I was here before Kilroy"

I like most on here have followed your thinking at some point, but have had to ditch our intuition along with comman sense and a good part of our sanity when we found out we were lost down the rabbit hole after schrodinger's cat ate our breadcrumbs.

An observer changing the outcome is a very real repeatable experiment with non wavey results.

https://physicsworld.com/a/do-atoms-going-through-a-double-s...

It's similar to the problem that has been highlighted here by OP, to quote the artical I posted

"Indeed, the results of both Truscott and Aspect’s experiments shows that a particle’s wave or particle nature is most likely undefined until a measurement is made. The other less likely option would be that of backward causation – that the particle somehow has information from the future – but this involves sending a message faster than light, which is forbidden by the rules of relativity. "