ghvknvgvh

You have an agenda dude.

Still stodgy boring dorks on the inside though.

Incorrect.[0]

[0]: https://energy.gov/lpo/ford

> The trouble with statements like 'for the average xyz user' is: 1. 50% of your users won't have their needs met

Oh come on. You know what's meant: no nerds. That's 99% of users who'll have their needs met, not 50%.

You mean to beg taxpayers for money?

This guy works at Slashdot by the way. Nothing worth stealing in their servers, methinks.

Have you thought of what would happen if you collided with a car?

And then, have you thought of what would happen if you were in a car?

In the car, you have a crumple zone.

In the bike, your kids are the crumple zone.

This is not news, therefore it doesn't have to be written in the style you linked.

If it was, people would read the first paragraph, move on, and then complain that they wasted their money in buying whatever newspaper/magazine they're reading.

Link?

They don't do car accidents in Japan? Astonishing.

> I can carry 2 kids on it

Are you nuts? Do you want them to die?