News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

ghost_pepper

Re:Mozilla: The state of open source AI on Friday July 17, 2026 @02:12PM (#48950412)
Virtually every article about AI these days is written by AI. It's obvious why, but boy is it nauseating to read
Re:AI changes the economics of software rewrites on Thursday July 09, 2026 @04:39PM (#48852069)
That's the sign of a good product: when you have to lie that you don't use it.
Re:AI changes the economics of software rewrites on Thursday July 09, 2026 @02:28PM (#48850382)
This website has four articles, once daily, three of which being AI crap and doomsaying (the fourth arguably too, it just doesn't say so), all with lines like:

> A fast car doesn't win races — a driver does

> the gap is not just speed - it's output quality

> A rewrite isn't just an opportunity to modernise your technology stack - it's an opportunity [...]

Garbage.

Anyone with experience know how DuckDuckGo compares to Kagi in terms of quality of search results?
I've been writing Rust backend services for years and the 5% has never mattered, I don't even bother checking if things advertise tokio support. Which ones in particular caused you trouble?
Re:Postmortem: TanStack npm supply-chain compromise on Monday May 11, 2026 @08:05PM (#48102446)
yes, they used pull_request_target for a benchmarking suite. github has a huge warning saying to never use pull_request_target to run user code, but this is just going to keep happening