getoffmyawn

i'm sorry you live in a hellhole country and your friends don't understand how bittorrent works. maybe one day you can immigrate to a second-world country and grow some cojones, but until then you should continue living in fear and scaring your peers from downloading leaks early when there aren't fed trackers.

> I wonder, with the rise of deep fakes and CGI, why a company hasn't come up with a business model offering professional rendered synthetic child pornography. It seems to me that there would be demand for it, and if an ethically un-encumbered product is indistinguishable from the real thing, much of the demand of child sexual abuse imagery would evaporate.

I suppose law enforcement could use it in sting operations. but if it proliferates wouldn't it still be illegal otherwise? seems legally and morally fishy to me.

> I mean, a spy just has to access whatever systems are already at his or her disposal and listen to your calls. They don't need to do any of that!

perhaps domestically, but certainly not in a foreign country.

>So, they even say that this article is about raising awareness of this kind of attack vector. They are raising awareness. Thanks spies!

I'm not sure what you're are trying to say here. Does this discredit the article?

so the methods work, but we just can't tell if they're working? I imagine that would be quite financially convenient for people selling methods that don't work. if it's a game you can't measure if you're winning, it's a casino game. and casino games always favor the house.