getemback
Re:A Bay Area developer wants to build 4,400 homes where they may be s...
on Friday July 28, 2017 @08:03PM (#14878599)
In retrospect, even the pretext was bunk. It turns out that turfing old people out of their giant, valuable houses is a benefit rather than a problem. Today, thanks to Prop 13, Boomers are massively over-housed.
Re:A Bay Area developer wants to build 4,400 homes where they may be s...
on Friday July 28, 2017 @06:40PM (#14878149)
"Reston is a Car-Dependent city" -- https://www.walkscore.com/VA/Reston
Re:A Bay Area developer wants to build 4,400 homes where they may be s...
on Friday July 28, 2017 @05:24PM (#14877696)
You obviously have no idea what the boundaries of Brisbane are.
Re:A Bay Area developer wants to build 4,400 homes where they may be s...
on Friday July 28, 2017 @05:11PM (#14877603)
You seem to be defining "Brisbane proper" as the area between San Francisco Ave. and Firth Park. But Brisbane is much more extensive. The majority of its land area is taken up by empty land, single-story material handling facilities, and ludicrous sprawl at "The Ridge".
Re:A Bay Area developer wants to build 4,400 homes where they may be s...
on Friday July 28, 2017 @04:26PM (#14877280)
Re:A Bay Area developer wants to build 4,400 homes where they may be s...
on Friday July 28, 2017 @04:20PM (#14877222)
This one is. It almost seems designed to trick a machine learning classifier into classifying it as a warehouse or something.
Point it the existing built environment of Brisbane, CA is not worth preserving. Its car-dependent nature is a menace to the region.
https://www.google.com/maps/@37.6916572,-122.4087356,3a,90y,...
Re:A Bay Area developer wants to build 4,400 homes where they may be s...
on Friday July 28, 2017 @04:16PM (#14877194)
With respect to your and our values, the people of the state have mandated that greenhouse gas emissions be reduced below 1990 levels by year 2020, and state law requires every city to adopt a climate action plan to that effect. Brisbane's adopted plan recognizes that transportation is the majority of the city's greenhouse gas emissions, and acknowledges that "Lack of affordability in urban core housing causes people to live far away from where they work", but does not propose fixing this problem. The only solution their climate action plan proposes is to install public electric car chargers!
Re:A Bay Area developer wants to build 4,400 homes where they may be s...
on Friday July 28, 2017 @04:04PM (#14877095)
I was just objecting to the idea that a small town was inappropriate in this context. With a suitable urban form there's no reason why you couldn't take the entire population of Brisbane and put them all on 640 acres, with 80% open space.
But Brisbane, California is not a "small town" it's a disgusting example of exurban sprawl.
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Brisbane,+CA/@37.679201,-1...
Re:A Bay Area developer wants to build 4,400 homes where they may be s...
on Friday July 28, 2017 @03:59PM (#14877065)
It's on ice. Nobody is building anything in Coyote Valley. But it's a wonderful plan.
Re:A Bay Area developer wants to build 4,400 homes where they may be s...
on Friday July 28, 2017 @03:53PM (#14877006)
There's nothing wrong with small villages 7 miles from a major city or even a capital city, if the principal city is built properly. If you walk 7 miles from the center of Zurich, Switzerland you'll probably find yourself in the middle of a vineyard or pasture.
Re:A Bay Area developer wants to build 4,400 homes where they may be s...
on Friday July 28, 2017 @03:30PM (#14876854)
Those numbers don't make a lot of sense. Wouldn't 4400 homes generate something in the vicinity of 50 million dollars in annual property taxes?
Re:A Bay Area developer wants to build 4,400 homes where they may be s...
on Friday July 28, 2017 @03:27PM (#14876835)
This has been going around, but even this plan to build 4400 dwellings is still total nonsense, because the plan also includes office space for 15000 people. 15000 jobs requires much more than 4400 dwellings, so this plan will just make things worse.
I recommend comparing and contrasting with this plan for Coyote Valley, to see what real urbanism looks like. http://www.greenbelt.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Coyote-V...
Re:The Company Behind Many Surprise Emergency Room Bills
on Monday July 24, 2017 @02:09PM (#14841066)
Most Americans repeat "socialism is bad" while driving down their toll-free interstate highways.
Re:The Company Behind Many Surprise Emergency Room Bills
on Monday July 24, 2017 @02:08PM (#14841051)
Essentially, poor white Americans oppose any kind of social service that might benefit black Americans. Virtually every problem that America faces is complicated by this one simple fact, which is an echo of the fact that half the country literally went to war over their preference to enslave black people. Despite this glaring and obvious reality, most commentators are afraid to mention it.
Re:Pittsburgh Gets a Tech Makeover
on Sunday July 23, 2017 @04:17PM (#14834171)
Seattle is at a higher latitude.
Re:Pittsburgh Gets a Tech Makeover
on Sunday July 23, 2017 @03:32PM (#14833958)
In the internal Google salary survey, controlling for level and tenure, salaries in Pittsburgh are within 10% of salaries in Mountain View. Moving to Pittsburgh is similar to getting an enormous raise. However "controlling for level" masks the fact that Pittsburgh is Siberia, far from the palace court where it is harder to be promoted to a high level.
Re:Pittsburgh Gets a Tech Makeover
on Sunday July 23, 2017 @03:07PM (#14833852)
Most people don't realize that because it's not true. The air quality of the combined statistical area of San Francisco is worse than that of the CSA containing Pittsburgh, but pollution in the expansive San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose CSA is centered elsewhere, whereas Pittsburgh is the pollution epicenter of its CSA. This is due chiefly to its geography, not some kind of moral failing. San Francisco has very favorable geography for air quality.
As for your linked article, that seems irrelevant. Nobody thinks Hanford, CA is an upcoming tech hub.
Re:Pittsburgh Gets a Tech Makeover
on Sunday July 23, 2017 @02:41PM (#14833705)
There are still major steel works in the area, some of which are operating with grandfathered emissions limits. Also Pittsburgh receives the wind-blown emissions of practically every coal-fired power plant in the nation.
Re:Pittsburgh Gets a Tech Makeover
on Sunday July 23, 2017 @02:37PM (#14833692)
Re:Pittsburgh Gets a Tech Makeover
on Sunday July 23, 2017 @01:37PM (#14833372)
Good luck finding a sunny day because Pittsburgh enjoys the fewest hours of annual sunlight of any major city, and continues to have air quality as bad as any other US city, being in the top ten worst according to the Lung Association.
Re:How Google Wants to Rewire the Internet
on Monday July 17, 2017 @07:00PM (#14792994)
Google's CDN is huge and extensive. See https://peering.google.com/#/infrastructure
Re:U.S. health care's widespread overbilling problem
on Monday July 10, 2017 @04:29PM (#14739350)
Agreed on the scam. The way to handle this is to not pay, and send a letter claiming that you don't owe it. If they send it to collections you can sue for collecting a debt not owed. If a collector contacts you about debts they know or should have known are disputed then you can also collect statutory damages from those people. If they report to credit rating agencies, and you dispute the facts with them and they take more than a month to resolve the issue you can also sue those agencies, and you have fresh grounds for suing the debt collector as well. You may be awarded treble damages!
This is an amusing pastime if you can afford temporary depressions in your credit score.