geondo

Yes, in Europe, where there are weak/no legal speech protections. And already politicians have abused it to remove compromising political info.

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-27423527

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jul/11/politicians-cr...

http://fortune.com/2015/08/24/twitter-right-to-be-forgotten/

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/googles-right-be-forgotten-70000-po...

I'm not claiming you're wrong, but do you have any evidence that there are a substantial number of people paying for CP via Bitcoin over Tor sites? I think people tend to overestimate how sophisticated criminals are.

While I think that's probably true to some degree, why don't we use this to justify banning any sort of media that people wish didn't exist about themselves? For example, secretly filmed or leaked sex videos or pictures containing adults would have a similar effect on the unwilling adult participant(s) but to my knowledge they are not illegal. Something being traumatic or embarrassing to someone is not generally sufficient reason to criminalize its possession.