gc0119

Oh the DDoS protection and traffic routing, their service is pretty easy to set up.

That is true!

In the meantime I’ll get the high-end feature sign-up page ready asap. Thanks a bunch!

@Wistar I'm over the moon hearing this and would love to make this official asap. Could you please shoot us an email at [email protected] so we can get you at least onboard with a beta? I'm so overwhelmed to hear serious users willing to support us!

Thanks for liking it @t_mann!

https://cleanupphotos.com provides a mobile/desktop interface for editing photos simply using your thumb/mouse to drag boxes (automatic) or brushes to remove unwanted objects. It’s free!!

We will definitely keep it free. We are still trying out different business plans and will leave this answer open for now. Sorry for the vague response.

Thank you @mbforbes!

@jenthoven respect to the hustlers kapwing.com! Thank you!

Whoot thanks for the comparison!

Love your comments! Definitely QA'd just for that single beach lol

@Wistar We're happy you enjoyed it! Thank you!!

Thanks @njgroene, will try to improve the UI asap! I agree, most users might only need brushes. Great feedback, helps prioritize important aspects!

Thanks a bunch @hansvm, certainly enlightened by expert's view!

Wow, that's a really dark one! Never thought it could reproduce a piece of history, you made my day.

@brk Sorry for the superrr late response, but please give it a try!

We haven't yet tested all the screen sizes so we've built it to look nice on laptops and phones. Please let me know if the texts are showing up weird on your device. I'll make sure it doesn't. Thanks a bunch!

Thanks for testing it out!!

Thanks for the thumbsup on painlessness!

I've personally tried to remove watches, glasses, small things blocking the skin and they are fine. But for large portions, it won't be good. Someone pointed out things like a better algorithm might give more realistic results. Those are in our pipeline, but they require more hardware resources which might end up as a sign-up service. Similar thing goes to processing higher resolution images.

This is valuable feedback, thank you!

Thank you @costcofries!

If you see the dirty blob, here are some things to consider 1. Switching between box and brush, in most cases one of them would work better. 2. Box would be preferred for full object removal, Brush would be good for texture retouch, but it could vary some times so try both. 3. The result won't be pretty on big object removal. 4. Remove the dirty blob or "Undo" and box/brush again.

We are working on more advanced backend to get a cleaner job done, sorry for the frustration. Thanks for trying it out and the valuable feedback!

Apologize for the super late reply and hope you gave it another try.

In this case we actually benefit from CloudFlare on the launch. The hug is quite hard from HN. We love you HN.

That's a really great suggestion using Gimp. I agree, backend-locked is not ideal. I really appreciate the feedback, thank you!

@moffkalast, thanks for the feedback! It's currently at 1024 pixels, hope that's not as bad as the experience yesterday. The processing speed will slow down a bit though, hope that won't affect the usability on phones. Thank you!

Thanks for pointing out, it’s indeed our own edited photo from Lake Tahoe. Will swap the word with “watermark”. Appreciated!

Ah that’s a sharp eye!!

Thanks for trying it out and the compliments!!

Thank you for your kind words @orobinson!