gavin-1
gavin-1 on Hacker News
One day Elon will notice you!
It's on the rise right now, just under different names.
Ironically it's the supposedly freedom loving tech bro libertarians who tend to go down the neoreactionary/fascist pipeline after they "give up" on democracy. They just don't like being labeled as fascists. Since you're on HN and willfully blind to what's going on, I think it's safe to assume that if you voted in 2024, then you voted F. Yes?
Is VW run by a fascist still to this day? (no)
Tesla? (yes)
Where are you seeing 30%?
I feel like I keep seeing this claim, month after month, but then I look it up and he's still got around the same ~38% approval. I keep getting my hopes up that people are finally realizing how awful he is, only to be disappointed again. It's depressing.
You shouldn't be getting down voted. That comment was definitely generated by an LLM and it was actually disturbing to me that so many people were replying as if it weren't glaringly obvious.
It's not foo, it's bar.
Baz became qux.
That's foobar.
Baar baaz — quux quuz.
Not a fair comparison.
Immigrants are not killing Americans en masse nor taking the land by force.
> I think he's not very much to blame for taking the money from degenerate gamblers, and the cryptocurrency idiots are mostly to blame for their own mistakes.
I empathize with the disdain for crypto idiots, but I still think the people running or promoting these scams deserve most of the blame. "There's a market for my poison" is every dopamine dealer's excuse.
Elon may describe himself as a "free speech absolutist", but his actions betray his insincerity in saying that.
The man isn't even mildly pro free speech. He is only "absolute" about defending the speech that he likes and agrees with.
With that in mind, it really says something about his beliefs when he defends and even boosts actual nazis.
"long Lyme" isn't well defined, but you're probably thinking of chronic lyme [1]. This article refers to PTLD.
The distinction matters. Chronic lyme is quackery that encourages people to pursue aggressive long-term antibiotic treatment for a non-existent persistent bacterial infection. Often these are people who have never been infected with Borrelia in the first place.
The article directly contradicts the persistent (undetectable) bacterial infection "chronic lyme" theory.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronic_Lyme_disease
What does conservative brain drain mean?