News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

galaktus

Re:You Might Also Like on Tuesday November 08, 2022 @04:27AM (#33517449)
> This is all 100% a dark pattern to keep users locked into Apple.

Quite a bold statement that it is like that to lock in users. I highly doubt that. This is rather negligence as Apple still has a hard time to catch up with the main product features.

Re:I regret my website redesign on Friday July 22, 2022 @04:08AM (#32189720)
Highly disagree. Usually developers are utter crap in design and cannot do it appropiately in context (he makes <40k per month with the website).

The design is okay and due to the inefficiencies he spent too much. But with a better process in place he would have gotten a very good deal from that agency.

Re:A systems model of anxiety-driven procrastination on Sunday July 17, 2022 @01:59PM (#32129266)
procrastination and degraded metabolism didnt deliver me results in Google. Do you have any sources?
Re:The Rise and Fall of the Manufactured Home – Part I on Saturday July 16, 2022 @02:08PM (#32120441)
> absolute unresalability

That is not true. There absolutely is a market for resale.

Re:Thoughts on the potato diet on Tuesday July 12, 2022 @01:38AM (#32066067)
You don't seem to factor in the glycemic index. If someone spreads such meals over the day, it keeps spiking blood sugar levels (potatoe meals have a high glycemic load) and realsing lots of insulin. That doesn't sound too efective for weightloss.
Re:As TikTok grows, so does suspicion on Sunday July 10, 2022 @04:16PM (#32048556)
> That's 85% of the future generation of US senators [...]

That is false. Many young people who are material for such position, don't care about tiktok.

Re:Observations on 6 Years of Journaling on Thursday June 23, 2022 @03:48PM (#31854285)
The emotional regulation part looks promising to me. How does that kind of journaling look like to help with that?
Re:Please Stop Using Grey Text on Wednesday May 18, 2022 @07:37AM (#31421515)
Why stop using Medium???
Why would you make such false claims?
> Most of these pictures were probably lit very carefully with high quality lights, or else were taken in bright daylight, and the phone was probably held in a high quality tripod. It is also likely that hundreds of dollars worth of software was used to edit each of these images.

Like they do with "professional" cameras as well.