fzvqq

>Speakers [...] tend to aspirate the “s” sound in many words, making it similar to the “h” in English (or the “j” in Spanish). For instance, they might say “No je donde está la caja” (I don’t know where the house is) instead of the standard “No sé donde está la casa.”

That's called jejeo, and it is widespread in some parts of the south of Spain, and as an accent it's probably the lowest of the low.

I'd rather see that money spent by a rich man to buy a yacht than on food stamps.

I live in Spain and this is false. There is Uber/Uber Eats/something similar in all cities and big towns, airbnb everywhere, chat support, all businesses have either a website or social media presence, you can book a table using whatsapp or social media such as Instagram, etc. Spain is nothing like you imagine it.

Consider not buying Apple products if you want to control your device.

Personally I didn't want to write anything just to see it flagged in seconds.

It's not full. I want to see screenshots of the entire chat.

What's missing from this whole conversation is a transcript of what was exactly asked of ChatGPT and what it replied back...

They shouldn't have a reliable way of detecting whether their users are children, BUT they should be fined for letting children use their platform. Why not just fine it for no reason? The result will be the same.

Because the government wants to give itself the responsibility of raising the children and controlling society at large. Fining the parents would be like saying that parents are in charge of their children and that goes against the interests of the government.

Every time an age-verification system law appears, or a company is verifying age on their own, HN is against it, or laugh at how easy it is to bypass.

But then this happens and comments are full of people happy that they were fined for not protecting children.

Can you make up your minds?