fuu_dev
MacOS 27 is also diffrent in that it does still downloads the data for EU users and removes or hides options in menues to dissable functionality. This means users lose the said space when upgrading to 27.
Any modern game console has some form of decryption, which can be argued to prevent access.
This is when we run into the chicken/egg problem because you can't write emulation without violating 1201. It is also in part the argumentation Nintendo used in the yuzu case.
Apple really makes you pay for it.
Data has the problem of getting successively tainted by LLMs as well as the lack of open high-quality datasets.
While architecture has the problem of shifting too much focus on a flawed architecture - transformers.
Maybe that's even a bit too pesimistic. Cloud computing already gives companies incentive to focus on efficiency for cost saving and there is a growing trend to write simpler more performant software to replace existing tools, however not specifically in the general purpose computing space.
Having it opt-in also does means most websites can't use it given that the vast majority of their userbase are on default settings.
2: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=117805...
Reality is that AI features rarely replace anyone but amplify the individual that can incorporate it in their skillset.
The best option would be if models like Imagan, Dall-E and Midjourney all followed this open principle, as each of the approaches has its strengths and weaknesses and could potentially learn from each other to improve.
The reality is that the highest impact on user share is the default browser.
Shortly after that is habit and user experience and this is what apple controls, it is fairly easy to restrict options for the competition or use dark patterns to impact the ux and apple is using this already to their advantage.
The reality here is that we need to be objective and ask what benefits the user gets from this restrictions and what risks they bring and i think two decades of defaults do make a lot of people ignore that instead of being critical.
The browser is still very crypto based and comes with their own build in add service and crypto currency.
Only very recent they started to add some fingerprint protection, its still only a very small subset of fingerprinting but it potentially blocks some approaches of it.
There is still a big question mark about the browser, because the base building block of privacy is trust and Brave has many times showen that it might not a trustworthy company with issues that only got addressed after public outrages.
The minimum time between 2 vaccinations is 2 weeks but it might be better to have a longer interval according to research².
Recovered need to wait for a minimum of 21 days before getting a vaccination.
Vaccination need to be refreshed after 270 days.
The implementation was the following:
- FFP2 Mask mandated in essential services like pharmacies, grocery store and postal offices for everyone.
- No Mask or distancing mandate for anyone who was vaccinated or recovered.
- Mask mandate and a negative covid test that is not older than 24/48h depending on the testing method for non vaccinated for anything outside of essential services.
Austria has a around 60% vaccination rate² and around 12% of the population had an documented infection³.
Herd immunity is a discussion point but scientists are undecided how high the numbers need to be. Estimates from earlier this year did talk about 60% but this number was raised and some experts even say its impossible.
2: https://orf.at/corona/daten/impfung
3: https://graphics.reuters.com/world-coronavirus-tracker-and-m...
There is also further discussion about requiring PCR-Tests for the non restricted groups.
https://davidgerard.co.uk/blockchain/2020/06/06/the-brave-we...
The point is that you should stay critical. People love to glorify the Linux userbase when Linux is often not a economical option.
You will find a lot of stories about it on google. Here is one: https://steamcommunity.com/app/332250/discussions/0/49463250...
But why is this invalidated by allowing allowing the user to install software from other sources, allow a the user to install a browser that is not a skin on top of safari, allow non apple game streaming services on the platform, allow the use of images/text that mentions or shows competing software company logos/names, allow apps to show price differences in payment processing or allow established payment methods like PayPal to be used on the platform.
If would still allow the same user to only use apple pay or the apple version of their loved service of choice but also gives users that don't alternatives.
A layer on youtube³ however says throughout multiple videos that epic has a (if even)very weak case and apple is in the right.
I would be interested to have someone break it down to understand the case.
This means umatrix will break most websites by default and require you to check what elements are required and allow them manual but offers higher security because you essentially audit every website you visit.
Benchmarks are vital. They can give you an estimate of how your application performs. They also often showcase how optimized a product is on different platforms.