frwdr

I'm not a big fan of his style either, but compared with the integrity of those accusing him I can make allowances. It takes but a few minutes to illustrate my point: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DbwiXRmzKi0

That's very interesting. I never understood why more people haven't made the connection between objects in the front end and PHP objects in the backend, and how it's only natural to unify those into one language instead of messing with seperate html, css, js etc. Anyhow good luck to you guys, it's the way to go, i want to keep working on more features and then maybe i'll give you a shout if i feel i've got something new worth contributing :)

Wow, that's creepy. I've just been building exactly the same thing - i even used the same keywords.

I read this in print so i'm going to assume this is the same. I think it's a very sensasionalist, bandwagon-hopping headline, and the majority of economic principles are just as sound now as they were before. The problem lies in their application; too often economic models are being over-simplified for people who are not familiar with their workings, and people without this understanding are making important decisions based on them. The other obvious fundamental problem with economics is that you will never be able to account for everything, and there are some things you won't realise you've missed till you can observe their effects. This isn't economics going wrong, that is how economics progresses. There are plenty of things that can be learnt from recent events, but it's naive to suggest that most post-Keynesian research is suddenly worthless, as was suggested in other articles in that issue.