News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

frosting

Re:Tom Hanks on Typewriters on Tuesday August 02, 2016 @01:04PM (#12211363)
Same with myself and fointain pens, I can fix them, tweak them, and know exactly how it works.
Re:Why do so few humans kill themselves? on Tuesday July 26, 2016 @12:59PM (#12167037)
I get myself into interesting positions quite often by arguing this exact thing. Suffering is a bit of information about the state of your body/mind etc. I can imagine the best life possible, with the most contribution to society, being a huge source of pain and suffering.

Generally speaking, of course, that's not a safe bet. Suffering tends to be associated with damage and psychological stress, which are rarely good things. I'd take 8/10 pain every day for the next 40 years though over something like dimentia or advanced alzheimers.

That said, I'd also take pain over severe depression. That shit sucks.

Re:Book Piracy as Peer Preservation on Tuesday July 26, 2016 @12:50PM (#12166956)
Because it disagrees with the ethical principles someone might want to live their life by.
Re:Book Piracy as Peer Preservation on Tuesday July 26, 2016 @12:47PM (#12166939)
Historically speaking, the only reason anyone "owns" media is due to literally hundreds of years of lobbying. Books, stories, and songs were all once free to copy. This is the nature of religious books, fairy tales, and folk songs.

Ethically speaking, "ownership" has a tenuous position. I find it easier to argue that ownership is a construct of society than it is an innate part of anything. That means it's flexible to what society decides. Right now, on this issue, that's definitely in flux.

From a utilitarian perspective, it's really pretty weird too. Ignoring economics for a second (that's my next point), it is probably better for all society to have information free of barriers. A lot more people can enjoy it if more people have access, particularly when the cost of copy and distrubution is so cheap.

Economically it costs a LOT of money though. HBO would not produce game of thrones without being able to get said money back. And they're only going to put as much money into it as they expect to get back. Why don't we have more CGI dragons? because HBO, while rich, is not an endless supply of money. and CGI dragons are really expensive. Yes, to reiterate the point, if HBO had enough money we'd have more dragons.

And as for the cost? $15/month for one show is actually VERY reasonable. Remember it costs millions of dollars to produce - just that one show. Even if you don't watch any other show you are still getting more than your money's worth. If you do watch other shows (And I highly recommend it), it's still easily worth your money. BTW, Netflix, HuluPlus, etc are also all worth their relative costs relative to what you get out of them.