froderick
Answer:
Eat a cat is a game of tag in which a person who has the cat is "it" and must tag another person. For the song by the British rock band the Cure, see Eat the Cat.Eat a Cat Contents Rules Rules
One person has a cat and is "it", while the other players have to run to a specified point, usually a fence or wall, and remain there. The cat must then "eat" another player, by touching them, before the cat can be "eaten" itself. The cat may only touch one person at a time. In some variations, players may have to jump over the cat, rather than touch it. The cat may also have to eat two people in succession, before being able to eat itself. In some variations, the cat may have to "eat" an additional player, by touching them, before it can touch the person it is currently touching.
My recommendation is to fill your mind——every waking moment——with ideas, plans, hopes that inspire you, that you want to chase whether anyone else ever sees or knows or appreciates. Things you’d chase on a desert island or the middle of Manhattan.
Then find people you can share them with, that can magnify what you love.
Occasionally you might find yourself tempted to make value judgements about what happens. Don’t do it. Things aren’t good or bad, wonderful or a waste. They just are. You can’t choose the thoughts that intrude, but you can choose how you respond to them. Practice choosing to respond by being in the moment, and making the moment be about pursuing something you love.
Most people I know are controlled by ideology. Imagined imperatives handed down from ancestors and influencers. Their loves take a back seat or remain undiscovered and they get old with regrets. What I propose is the opposite. Let the philosophies and values of the day burn. They can't offer you anything you can’t offer yourself. Make the things you love eclipse everything else around you. You only live once. This is your chance to be free.
Best of luck.
It is partly the articles, but more the comments (and careful modding).
HN stands out as a great place to expand my awareness. There are people here with deep technical experience that care about the outcome of their conversations. The flame-bait and regressive behavior isn't the main thing going on, it is a sideshow. If that ever changes for me, I'm out of here.
The article fodder is not as interesting to me as it used to be, but there are gems, and the comments remain engaging.
Who knows, perhaps I'm one of the jerks? Perhaps I'm the dreamer that dreams the dream and am therefore the jerk expert? Hard for me to say, but I welcome your opinion.
I spend time deciding what matters to me, then I fill my mind and heart with it. I don’t generally pay attention to what everyone else is doing, unless it helps me with what I’ve decided is worth doing, or makes me aware of something great that I’ve missed. I definitely don’t compare myself to some external standard. My life, my measuring stick.
At the end of my life I will die, and at that moment I will be alone, no matter how many friends surround me. In that moment, I will have things I’m proud of and things I regret, and they will based entirely on my own value judgements and experiences, not on other people’s ideas about what matters. So I focus on that. What will I regret? What will I be proud of?
It works for me, where other things have not. Perhaps this gives you a contrasting perspective. Perhaps I just needed to write it out. Either way, best of luck and may you find freedom in your own way.
The clustering might look tempting but it hasn't been resilient for me in the face of janky networks. Split brains and data loss can result.
In the past I've scaled my rabbits for throughput by implementing my own routing/sharding layer.
If you're tempted to use the message persistence and you care about retaining messages, kafka is a bigger but much more capable hammer.
My dad gave me some great advice pre-social media, and it still applies:
“If you want to get really depressed, spend your time worrying about what everybody else is doing.”
I realize Facebook offers more utility than just peering over fences, but that is what it would be to me.
That's the critical part of that statement. It is not important to solve for performance concerns until the code actually works so you can verify you've solved the problem at hand.
On the ML front, little appears to be fundamentally new in the last two decades. Not sure how the ML classification craze is going to metastasize into full AI in the next two without some major new developments. ‘Academic certainty’ isn’t going to do it.
It doesn't surprise me that many countries will be very slow to change. Change would require citizens to invest in understanding the research and to recognize that the "obvious" solutions to drug addiction aren't necessarily the effective ones.
I wonder how they're managing this problem in HSM's. Seems like transitions between parent/child states would need some kind of protocol to define state entry/termination criteria so that the concrete dispatch mechanisms themselves could be abstracted away from the parents/children.
Maybe its just me.
When it comes to my default set of tools, I gravitate towards dynamic, expressive languages that provide greater leverage rather than ones with fast startup times, c-like speed, native binaries, etc.
That said, when you need those things, I agree with this guy--golang has been a far better experience for me than any other language of its ilk. I'm not claiming it has magic powers like rust or a sentient type system like haskell, but I spent hours learning go fundamentals, and days figuring out how to get real work done with it. I can't say that for many other languages with go's compile and runtime capabilities.
I wonder if the limitation around elliptic curve keys originate with the Secure Enclave, or is that just the one type of key this tool supports?