frankyg

Are some people trying to pervert or redefine the term "source"?

Berlin didn't care enough.

> excessively

lol ... "duUuh" eyeroll

NomNomNom.

Good LLM.

+1 for the images if you put at least enough plants in them.

dude just experimented a bit.

science is when what you call rigour leads from hypothesis closer to fact or not fact.

op just tried a quick and dirty experiment with duck tape and stuff.

get your attitude right, mate.

name three examples that describe the term pseudo-science, to begin with. Psychology doesn't count ^^

Haven't tried Meth yet. Jessa Reed almost inspired it couple o' years back when I was at my weakest but when her teeth fell out in the middle of an interview I decided to wait into my late 50s.

MDMA either puts me to sleep or makes me talk faster than freaking Busta Rhymes raps, without effort. I recorded it once and it's crystal clear. Fun stuff.

Need to get to the science of that mechanism.

Also some the best countries to hide criminal activity without having to hide yourself. <3

I don't think humanity is going to get around disclosing how exactly all that data flows into marketing, UX design and policies. Not in the form of pop-science books or blockbuster documentaries but detailed statistics and open reports by the companies themselves.

> More sophisticated methods of privacy also anonymize indirect identifiers, and in some cases personal attributes.

The original datasets are brokered anyway. [citations disclosed]

I have thoughts like that all the time but then I remember how many people have accounts at xyz at all and how often I created an account on abc, made a list or two and never returned (until I did). I have over 600 logins saved in my password manager and "holy fuck shit" some of the data on these sites is still "part of me", I just don't actively spend time on it. It's all quite usable.