flimflamm

Thinking too small. The interactive testing needs to be done by AI. Then the transcript is reviewed by the teacher.

One can decide to dedicate their own time to creating open SW. Typically someone (like tax payers or private companies) pay for the creation of scientific discoveries.

Thus there is indeed a difference in the monetary intensives.

It would be interesting to see what would be good input for LLMs to do the optimizations / trials on that automatically. Is the visual representation best or something else?

What prevents forgers from generating such magnetic fields? That might be worth while if people start to blindly believing that "pottery frozen magnetic fields are not possible to counterfeit". Note that "not possible to counterfeit" is not a claim in the article.

So we must move to 5 hour working days. Thanks OpenAI!

Excellent unless you have a mudflap in your back wheel in countries where it rains.

Thanks for this comparison. Very interesting and surprising!

To whom did you call with your server?

I on the other hand think that I have now found the smoking gun!

I configure it by copy pasting the pages to chatgpt and asking questions. Dumb? Maybe but seems to work.

We humans have a really good system to do this in practice. We use _imagination_ to simulate how things work and ... then we understand it.

However, there was only 57 however's in the paper it self.

Cost/manufacturing complexity. If you are country struggling to defend your self you don't think problems in 30 years if today problem is does the country exists or not. Might be difficult to put your self to a small defending countries shoes which is absolute running our of resources.

If you don't have workflows which repeat in inet you don't need openClaw. - Messages from school where to react - Getting payments from someone and tracking that you get them - Summary of news the way you like it from sources you like it every day - Integrated task lists reminders - Drafting taxation reports based on spending etc etc.

I just don't trust "the claw" so I build following system - Docker 1: * Locked up Claw docker - user level priv. Access outside to "one port" only.

- Docker 2: * Tool gateway with pre-baked commands - openclaw can only index what command to execute * Keys are here * Telegram hook to approve all "post" commands i.e. sending email or posting something somewhere.

- Docker 3: * LLM gateway keeping track of cost and routing

No as you could have multiple examples of expected output in single prompt. You should just "ask" - that's zero shot. If you "ask + provide" examples then you are in the n+1 shot realm. But I suppose terminology is shifting from this...

What confused me is the fact that in the paper all logical steps are give. It basically check that when all relevant facts are provided explicitly as links , how far and how complex a chain can the model correctly follow before it breaks down?

So it's simpler than "reasoning". This is not necessarily a bad thing as it boils down the reasoning to a simpler, more controlled sub problem.

Is this just buttering the cost of switches by crippling the optimization options compiler have?

I would focus on lowest of the axis. It does not help if some of the axis are at 100% if one of the axis is lacking.

Really really nice. Thanks for this!

Are the rules versioned somehow? I didn't see that.

Good to note that OpenAI solved 12/12 and DeepMind 10/12.

I wonder when Elon will go to nuclear business as green values have gone down (solar tiles anyone?)

I wonder what process in ASML is such that Mistral group would bring something new there...

Depends on the country. In Finland, it's ok to record your own discussions. Whether the recorder is BK (a third party) or the cashier is an interesting question, though.

Creating a database of recordings without user being able to know/influence is clearly violation of GDPR IF there is PII. That's going to be costly for BK.

Hah they kind of found "NULL" pointer in LLMs.

Have you looked in to "PSD2 and Open Banking regulation in Europe" ?

Except if you are a Finnish person who lives right next to Sweden (SEK) and Norway (NOK) who are not using Euro (and Russia but that's a different story).

I wonder if 6 would be understanding own thinking. Currently humans don't understand this. Thoughts just pop in to our heads and we try to explain what caused them.