facemelt2
Re:Google changes its search box
on Tuesday May 19, 2026 @07:55PM (#48201263)
A lot of people in these comments have strong opinions about the performance of a service they use frequently, for which they pay zero dollars, and is run by a public company with a fiduciary duty to provide ROI to its investors.
I wonder how many of them would switch to a paid model that offered pre-ai-era google search?
Re:Google changes its search box
on Tuesday May 19, 2026 @07:50PM (#48201234)
Did you just agree to a stranger's counterpoint on the internet?
This post should be in a museum somewhere
Re:Nailing jelly to a wall: is it possible? (2005)
on Wednesday May 13, 2026 @07:23PM (#48128991)
>How I sped up <important_tech_stack> by 2.8%
>something apolitical, filled with political bot comments
>ShowHN: an ai company you'll never hear of again
>NAILING JELLY TO THE GODDAMN WALL, !%#@ YEA (2005)
>why ai is bad
Keep it up HN <3
Re:Elon Musk pushes out more xAI founders as AI coding effort falters
on Friday March 13, 2026 @04:29PM (#47369417)
recent changes in their comment system have reduced my exposure to bots to a level I much prefer over every other platform I use
Re:RFC 454545 – Human Em Dash Standard
on Tuesday March 10, 2026 @01:46PM (#47326507)
This sounds like something an AI would write. It even uses the em-dash several times.
Re:Is AI the Paperclip?
on Monday February 09, 2026 @06:10PM (#46952900)
>Are we not madly harvesting the world’s resources in a monomaniacal attempt to optimize artificial intelligence?
No, we are not madly harvesting the world's resources in a monomaniacal attempt to optimize artificial intelligence. We are, however, harvesting the world's resources in an attempt to optimize artificial intelligence.