f233f2

You can't realiably poll from a mobile phone. Your app may not be allowed to execute any code, let alone make a network request for hours, or maybe forever.

It's like that because mobile clients need cooperation from the server to have push notifications, and you can't have IMAP servers cooperate in that regard :-) so the outlook servers fetch the mail for you and then send you the notifications.

I wouldn't have microsoft read my email either, of course. Thankfully in windows you have dozens of clients to choose from.

Probably because the new outlook can only access microsoft servers, so they synchronise icloud to outlook server-side and you only access outlook client-side.

And only 14 comments so he can't pretend it was some automatic process.

Thunderbird is improving so much and so fast since they left Mozilla. I wonder if the same could work for Firefox.

You buy IPTV stream passwords (or whatever is used to log in) from some guy and once he knows your card details he can use them for anything else, yes. That's how it works.

Title is false. He was selected for additional screening and he doesn't have any proof that it was because of his name. Also he wasn't stopped from boarding the flight, he was just screened more exhaustively than others.

I was expecting better from the BBC... oh wait I wasn't.

Unfortunately, no, prices haven't dropped for Renfe fares.

Coupled with: https://twitter.com/el_pais/status/1716776148049285585

There clearly is a reason for all of this: they don't want you travelling if you are poor.

+1, Iryo and Ouigo are recent and they are losing money. Renfe has always been tremendously expensive - more expensive than a car or plane.

These train travel success stories are anti-personal transportation propaganda. They want to push you to using trains and then they will raise the prices - they want you not travelling anywhere if you are poor.

The article does not say that he's being forced to engage with dissenting opinions.

>Federal officials allege Joseph David Emerson tried to shut down the engines in midflight and had to be subdued by the two pilots.

Why couldn't he? Does it take a long time to press the button, do you need several people to press it at once...?

This is pushed by people in the EU who aren't elected, so the only solution is to lobby for our countries to leave the EU.

Rich people can hire private security. Poor people can't. In terms of raw numbers, law enforcement's job is to protect poor people from other poor people.

Uber drivers are poor people.

Poor people cause much, much, much more work to law enforcement and the judicial system than rich people.

If we are to tax people because they benefit from public services, then poor people should be taxed more than rich people since they benefit from those services more.

That website contains

    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">

Not to mention forced dark theme is very hard to read for those of us with astigmatism.

It's absurd that this web site is advocating for people to disable bitlocker.

Also there is no source for the 45% figure.

Really you put a folder named "Bikinis" in your computer and expect the technician not to watch? This is practically entrapment.

>Right-wing government in power - sure we'll spread the hate for you and censor the voice of the opposition and minorities.

When has this ever happened in the West?

If he was making such statements (I'm not following this), does that mean that his lawyers were indeed being used by him to pass letters and that this is not propaganda?

Don't forget those fake plastic bags or paper bags that fall apart.

Correct.

Darwin probably has some theories about this.

The title is outrage bait. It wasn't adding "terrorist" to all translation of Palestinian bios, only to those that included a very specific phrase, and also the translation didn't make it sound like the user himself was a terrorist, since it talked about terrorists in an impersonal way.

I agree that the average person doesn't generally know how technology works. I think the solution is not to limit the use of technology but to restrict the exposure of the average person to technology until they can prove that they know how it works (some sort of internet license, if you will)

Are we really at the point where we need a disclaimer saying "automatic translations may not be accurate"?