etrabroline
The ownership of these companies are the ones pushing these politics. Their employees are just pointing out their hypocrisy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estrogen
Do you think these maybe have more to do with causing those differences in the first place?
I think you're off by several orders of magnitude, but yea it goes back a long way lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWWGmiZs4JA
Videos of blurry splotches and eye witness testimony that repeats the word "technology" over and over to imply that unlike the last 6, _this_ blurry splotch is an alien spacecraft is really just annoying at this point.
EDIT: Hey judge2020 did you watch Dr Mason's analysis I linked above? It's very informative and pretty entertaining too. I'll take your downvote as a no.
I don't think most farm animals are suffering through their entire life. They seem pretty all right to me. Factory chicken farms should be banned but not all meat.
Ok. How much land could be reforested that way? Most grazing happens in places that are naturally pasture and were never forest like Texas and Argentina. Northern cali isn't exactly known for beef.
2/3rds of land used for grazing being unsuitable for farming sounds like a lot to me.
EDIT: drooly, HOW MUCH land would become forested if cattle were removed? Because if it's like 1 acre then its not really a good argument for banning all meat. Also I explicitly said I DO think we could survive on an all vegetarian diet I just don't see any reason to do it.
I'm not sure there is enough arible land to support the human population without grazing animals. I suspect anything is possible with enough technology and money, but matthewmorgan is correct in being concerned.
>In March 2018, the Authority revised its estimate to $77.3 billion and up to $98.1 billion, pushing initial service to 2029 and services from Los Angeles to San Francisco to 2033
The cost of Ca HSR has gone up to $98 billion. There is no way building even 6 airports could possibly cost that much, and you can build the airports when you need the capacity one at a time and airports support travel to anywhere in the world, not just the handful of other cities in California the rails connect to.
https://www.therichest.com/luxury-architecture/10-most-expen...
> #1: Kansai International Airport - $20 billion
So California could build 5 huge earthquake proof airports in the middle of the ocean including sea wall and bridge for the cost of HSR. It just makes no sense. I'm not opposed to rail or high-speed rail. But the places where better public transportation are needed are mostly in the US North East where density is much higher. Existing rail infrastructure is crumbling in the North East while California asks for Federal money for white elephant boondoggles like Ca HRS. It's infuriating.
Planes fly in more or less straight lines from source to destination, and adding a new route is just some paperwork and renting the terminal space. No multi-billion dollar investment to connect a new nearby or distant city.
>flexibility of busses is not the same as the flexibility of a bus
Again, he means the flexibility of adding new routes, not having the bus pick you up at your hotel.
>Jeff Bullas: Now Shir started a range of companies but the recent one he's just launched which has raised over 12 million from one of the top capital firms in the world is with a company called accessiBe
https://www.jeffbullas.com/podcasts/33-making-the-web-access...
Here is an interview with the founder.
>in the army when I was thinking about the next thing that I've got to build when I'm released
I'm not really comfortable with Israeli companies run by former IDF soldiers injecting code into thousands of websites.
https://archive.org/details/CensoredIsraeliSoftwareSpyingOnU...
>adding a single line of code to the backends of websites. AccessiBe also offers support for websites that are sued and claims to bring them into compliance. The company boasts that over 132,000 websites use its product
This is a misdirection. de Blasio can no more screw over the real estate interests that control NYC politics than anyone else. He's an unpopular ineffective weak leader propped up by their system. His job is to take up space and be a punching bag, and he's doing a great job.
>One in four think hate speech is currently illegal
>strong majorities of both African-Americans and Latinos, believe that supporting someone’s legal right to say something racist is as bad as saying it yourself.
>two-thirds of white respondents oppose government bans on “public hate speech,” nearly three in five African-Americans (56%) and Latinos (58%) support such bans
>five in nine (55%) white Democrats oppose the bans
EDIT: I would like to apologize to effingwewt for not linking the original study and simply posting numbers taken directly from the study.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=mit+sparc+denni...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPARC_(tokamak)
and the STEP project in the UK
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_Tokamak_for_Energy_P...
Both are very promising, and unlike all previous experiments, if their core design goals are met they would quickly lead to commercialization, quite plausibly within 20 years.