eranima

It's pretty clear that the comments on this forum have gotten worse over the years, and I really really doubt banning people from calling that out is going to solve the problem.

I am not using multiple accounts, I don't know why you think I am. Calling out awful comments is not flame bait, it's calling out flame bait.

It's pretty disgusting that this crap is upvoted on Hacker News. This site's slow descent into reactionary politics is saddening

Typical Hacker News post really

Disappointed yet again with upvoted comments on hacker news defending murderers and terrorists. There's defending free speech then there's defending terrorism. This is not ok.

Giving up liberty for convenience sounds really dumb.

The constitution only has power if people are willing or motivated to enforce it.

That's not the issue. The issue is the Postal Service was required to prefund its pension plan 75 years in the future, a requirement no other government corporation has: https://ips-dc.org/how-congress-manufactured-a-postal-crisis...

Because not everyone can afford internet access?

Yet another bailout for wall street. Why couldn't these investors stop buying starbucks every day and save up like the rest of us?

The Fed doesn't have that power though, nor should they. That's up to congress to decide

Blaming young people seems stupid considering that everybody can spread the virus. This ageist nonsense isn't going to help stop the virus.

If you think Star Trek hasn't always been political, then you haven't been paying attention to any of the themes in Star Trek.

A bias is not the same thing as a conflict of interest.

It was coined by Werner Sombart, who was not a Marxist but rather a classical economics professor in Germany.

I'm a socialist but I applaud anyone willing to stand up against amoral practices like this. Your position closely resembles Warren's opinions on this matter.

This really has nothing to do with socialism.

Turns out the neoliberal startup crowd who downvoted you doesn't want people calling out this glaring problem.

Edit: ah, here they are to come downvote me

Because he's pointing out hate speech by lampooning it. Very different

Yeah, I don't agree with people advocating for violence against me. That's why I don't want it in my social circles. What's wrong with that? Why do you support hate speech? Do you agree with it?

If by "controlling what information you're allowed to access" you mean removing hate speech, then yeah they have the right and the duty to do that. I really wonder why you're against that.

Kinda. The breadbasket became the Great Plains, which resulted in the destruction of that habitat. The question is, is it worse to replace forest with farmland or plains with farmland?

This is very impressive! Is the world just flat or is it a full 3D sphere?

I'm from upstate NY, and the loss of "breadbasket" status was great for the local ecology. When we were the breadbasket of the country (when the country was much younger), all the forests were cut down and erosion and water quality were a much bigger issue.

Not all ads necessarily contain statements that would force Facebook to take a side on any issue or become an arbiter of truth. They could simply restrict political ads to essentially just "Vote for [candidate]", or something similar.

Source for your claim that this river is always in this state? Because the article disagrees with you. You don't think the country's largest drought has any impact on its largest river?

You seem looking for a reason to bash climate change and journalism in general.

Are you intentionally missing the point?

I'm not talking about global sea level, I'm talking about flooding outside of the dikes. This happens all the time in the Mississippi river.

That's not how water works. It doesn't magically spread out throughout the entire ocean immediately

You're ignoring the fact that the water has to go somewhere. Where is it going to go? Are you willing to flood your neighbors? Are your neighbors going to let you?