emveeoh
Re:Tim Cook is now required to fly on private jets only
on Thursday December 28, 2017 @02:36PM (#16024301)
Insert snarky comment about the reliability of airplanes vs apple software here...
Re:Chrome is Not the Standard
on Thursday December 21, 2017 @02:35PM (#15982045)
It seems they wanted press. Well, they got it...
Re:We Only Have Hours Left to Stop the NSA Expansion Bill
on Wednesday December 20, 2017 @03:25PM (#15973459)
They count on our fatigue and ignorance.
Re:Maps Showing Where FBI Planes Are Watching from Above (2016)
on Sunday December 03, 2017 @03:37PM (#15839440)
This seems like a reasonable way to police. My only issue is if the drones can be 'heard' flying over a location. For example, buzzing over a specific house or business. Neighbors would automatically assume danger or guilt. If they drone, they should stay out of ear-range from anyone on the ground. Nobody should hear surveillance.
Re:Microsoft and GitHub team up to take Git virtual file system to mac...
on Friday November 17, 2017 @02:57PM (#15725469)
Seems like Microsoft is trying to brand a cached proxy for Git...? This would make more sense as a paid service for those that need it. Possibly, a local appliance that a company would host internally. What am I missing...?
Re:Learn from your attackers – SSH HoneyPot
on Tuesday September 19, 2017 @09:06PM (#15290011)
+1 fail2ban (properly configured, of course)
Re:Disney will pull its movies from Netflix and start its own streamin...
on Wednesday August 09, 2017 @12:32AM (#14965554)
Reminder: Disney has Star Wars...
Re:Comcast says it will not sell customer browsing histories
on Friday March 31, 2017 @05:17PM (#14008354)
The reality is: privacy is no longer possible in a connected world. So, rather than worrying about collection/privacy. Maybe, the best use of our energy is best-spent trying to pass laws that standardize disclosure to the customer and the mandating of an audit process...?
Re:Comcast says it will not sell customer browsing histories
on Friday March 31, 2017 @04:59PM (#14008135)
Can someone explain to me why there is no Federal regulation requiring the ISP, and anyone else collecting data on us, to provide full disclosure to the customer whose data is being collected? Also, why are there no laws requiring an audit process on erroneous data?
In America, the credit reporting agencies are required to provide a free detailed report annually and there is a legally-mandated dispute process in place for false/erroneous data. Why don't we have the same protections/process for metadata collection?
Instead of expecting data-collecting companies to police themselves, we must insist on regulation requiring free, full disclosure of all data collected and a legal process to have false/erroneous data collection challenged and removed.
The biggest danger is not that they collect this information, but that there is no AUDIT PROCESS to correct false information.
Re:A Tale of Two Clouds: Amazon vs. Google
on Monday March 13, 2017 @04:21PM (#13861962)
Basically, an advertisement for Google barely disguised as an 'article'.