News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

eightbit

Re:Git 2.9 released on Thursday June 16, 2016 @10:53AM (#11916518)
git rebate... I wonder if there's also git refund, git coupon and git discount?
Re:Simple Rules for Healthy Eating (2015) on Wednesday May 25, 2016 @06:47PM (#11773769)
I'm not sure where you're going with this, but it's digressed far from what I was talking about. To paraphrase your argument, you're talking about assuming convexity, which is a big deal in financial modeling.

If convexity isn't assumed, you're right back to my original point.

Re:Simple Rules for Healthy Eating (2015) on Wednesday May 25, 2016 @02:08PM (#11771818)
Algorithmics would disagree with you: the greedy algorithm, or trying to find a global maximum from local maxima, usually fails as a method. It's usually a "stupider" way of doing things :P

My own experiences, especially related to corporations, seem to corroborate this.

Re:Introducing unlimited private repositories on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @10:16AM (#11675455)
> but is $9/worker/month really a lot to pay for all the stuff GitHub offers?

You make it sound like they're curing cancer. What does GitHub really offer above and beyond the other providers?

As an example, their PR reviewing systems sucks balls. It chokes on larger PRs (250 files!? Really?). Also, with files which have been essentially replaced, the diff can become so large that GitHub won't even show it, and since you can only add comments on PRs, you're sunk. I have to resort to sending around emails with code lines and comments on them.

GitHub is amateur hour. Their half-assed implementations of almost every piece of their functionality reminds me of the same BS Apple does on iOS.