editorializing
Why would stolen GPL code spit out poorly by the Chinese Room experiment be interesting or satisfy intellectual curiosity? Anyone can ask a chatbot to make anything, and according to LLM fans they'll do it, now. Zero value and zero intellectual curiosity possible in projects that used LLMs in their creation. Terrible take.
So many bad Show HNs lately, mostly langlemangle garbage. Zero thought, zero effort, zero skill, zero ingenuity, zero usefulness. Completely ruins the historical value of the "Show" tab, killing a valuable historical resource for everyone because of how heavily-invested YC is into the "hit the button to make disposable software" genre of company.
You seem to be editorializing because of your bias and financial interest in YC. "No one is talking about" is an idiom you allow onto the front page relatively frequently (check Algolia), and you allow speculation pointing up for industry trends.