dsf2g

One does not need to know of relative statistics to know that a) you dont see planes randomly dropping out of the sky on a regular basis b) people enjoy flying to hot destinations and are willing to accept the small chance the flight may not be risk-free - people are aware of this when they experience some level of turbulence when flying.

Finally, Ive seen plenty of your posts on here. You write with a particular tone. Who are you? A nobody who's spent a lot of time posting crap on here.

" Today people have pure unquestioned faith in both"

Not true at all. We accept the risks to obtain benefits but we also know having an accident in the air or in elevators is highly unlikely given what we know; so therefore its perfectly rational behaviour.

Hes had a hair transplant, done a bunch of stuff to his face etc etc. Not a chance he doesnt care about money, self-conceited etc.

And people used to cuss Steve Jobs lmao. Hes looking very normal compared to these folks.

"We are going backwards."

Scaling up to get more nuance and subtle stuff makes the whole damn thing break. Im waiting for others to realise this.

The evidence point is Brockmans sizeable donation. You think that was for nothing... lol come on.

Disagree somewhat.

A human with no exposure to information and taught techniques on how to produce outputs to achieve desirable outcomes? Yes stupid.

A human who once had this exposure, but no longer engages with the brain due to a machine providing access said output? Yes, that person becomes stupid.

The problem is much of how one protects oneself in the modern world is not phyiscal-prowess, it is intellectual-prowess.

The smart ones have already realised the negative impacts of LLMs et al and are going back to the old-fashioned way of learning/retaining knowledge: books and raw discipline.