dsagent

While I sympathize I think we all know a majority of contributions would not be hand written. This is optimizing for the reality we're in.

You could fork and reference it in the issue if you still wanted to contribute.

Very much this. LLMs are not producing code humans can maintain unless you take your time with them and still care about the quality of the output.

Maybe someone has the perfect claude.md that solves this problem but I have not seen it.

I think whats funny is that employees were most likely already covering the cost for these tools because they are useful. Companies didn't believe employees were using these tools and now have forced their usage and no longer have the costs subsidized.

Similarly companies seem to reward high token usage as a sign of someone willing to play ball with AI and again have forced higher costs on themselves for people reward hacking or using tokens out of spite.

Laravel

https://laravel.com/docs/13.x/authentication

https://laravel.com/docs/13.x/socialite

https://laravel.com/docs/13.x/sanctum

An increasingly disturbing trend from Github and I only see this getting worse.

I wouldn't rule out them moving away from offering the free tier to stop the all the code pushes. I think new code mostly written by AI isn't that appealing of a data set to train on.

We're starting to have that convo in our org. This is just getting worse and worse for Github.

Hosting .git is not that complicated of a problem in isolation.

They are also in the process of moving most of the infra from on-prem to Azure. I'm sure will see more issues over the next couple months.

https://thenewstack.io/github-will-prioritize-migrating-to-a...

it supports sqlite: https://docs.firefly-iii.org/references/faq/install/#i-want-...

I found this game late but its great!

I was hoping it was a Metal Gear solid reference.

https://metalgear.fandom.com/wiki/Zanzibar_Land

Let me save you some time:

#1 Atom

#2 Vim

#3 VS Code

#4 Notepad++

#5 Sublime Text