drpython
- You create a new problem to solve an already tough problem (information retrieval) - You bill people for storing vectors and searching when they are already paying for information storage and search - You overcomplicate a retrieval problem that has well-defined solutions - All the BS HYPE
The LLM wiki is one good option. At WAIC, I saw a company change the filesystem to store the document index as you save documents so they never go out of sync.
Think harder boys.
You no longer think in terms of a "single system" - you think in terms of composition, components, and combination. You may find category theory useful here, too.
Before AI, these higher-level abstractions had little practical value because translating them into reality was a huge undertaking.
AI shortcuts the "building" and "translating" process, so the practical value is magnitudes more palpable.
Brought back a lot of memories.
In the early 2000s, when video games weren't protected against DLL injection hacks, I spent a lot of time writing DLL injectors for fun and learning.
The line I used in every experiment was:
`jmp $` (or `EB FE` in machine code)
It was the shortest infinite loop in x86 assembly, equivalent to `while 1: ;`
I would create a minimal DLL with this assembly code, inject it into games like Battlefield 1942, and observe it in OllyDbg. The injected DLL would then start on a new thread and access all the game data in memory.
In 2027, other languages will become increasingly irrelevant.
1) hand-write a simple 2d TUI-based rogue-like in Rust using pretty much just the std; 2) grab opus 5.0 (it used to be opus 4.6, 4.7) and give it some vague "requests", and ask it to make this game "production-ready" and "blockbuster", but keep the 2d and TUI aspects so I can actually run it. 3) now the fun part, take a test subject, say GLM 5.3, and ask it to find code smell, architecture issues, duplication and all sort, and *simplify the code*
compare the result to my original version.
It's not a simple thing, but the concept is simple: can an LLM remove all the mud?
The winners so far are (ranked by the quality of the final result, not by token cost)
GPT 5.6 sol (extra high thinking); GLM 5.3; Grok 4.6; Qwan 3.8;
(fable could not make it to the list because it simply cannot follow the instructions)
Currently using an Aussie brand named Metabox (metabox.com.au) for virtual production workload on Windows. I've been using a Macbook Pro for the last 5 years for general-purpose tasks. Also using a few $100 "mini PCs" for home automation.