draw_down
draw_down on Hacker News
I am begging these things to use a normal fucking name for once
> American courts generally decline to enforce foreign judgments that violate the United States Constitution
Good grief. This is sad stuff.
Well, I guess it would be nice if the graduation cutoff were above the level of “knows what rhabdo is”
Shyeah, all those successful requests were really helpful for showing me a page, which then failed when I tried to do anything by clicking the buttons on the page. I was completely unable to merge things for hours, for no lack of trying. GH was down.
They're taking patio11's advice!
My problem is it’s usually the second guy advancing this argument.
Plus, the interest and expertise and passion used to favor the red team, attackers. If you wanted to defend against them you had to get on their level, or hire someone on their level. Thats either expensive or requires a time investment that doesn’t make sense for someone who is trying to do much more than just defend against attackers.
Now it’s just as you said- asking AI to red team your app will get you pretty far.
I don't work with video but this seems very nice, and your promo video is wonderful. Great work!
> Jeff Dean ... and other senior employees pledged to “neither participate in nor support the development, manufacture, trade, or use of lethal autonomous weapons.” Google signed the classified deal, yet they remain.
> I think he could have stopped the deal, yet he did not. He remains, yet I think he should not.
Is Jeff Dean still considered a saint at Google? If so, how come this doesn't change that? The amicus was enough?
“Jarred was a stinky manager”. Is this professional criticism?
It’s white text on black bg for me. But to answer your question- reader mode!
The language doesn't, but I'd say the language integration isn't the tricky part of this kind of cross-cutting-concern code. In JS you could imagine a function that decorates classes in some way, or React HOCs, etc. (We don't do HOCs anymore because we have a new kind of kludge, but we used to.)
The tricky part is as someone mentioned elsewhere in the thread: the attribute doesn't account for interactions well. You might want it to alter its behavior in different situations but the whole point is that it's cross-cutting and treats everything the same. (And I would say, even though I just called React hooks a kludge, that they are less cumbersome in this respect than HOCs were.)
Hmm, I think you’re not ever supposed to say anything negative about Ukraine.
I was pleased to see Congaree on here. It really does suck that bad.
The dystopia of searching for video clips and finding them? What?
I’ve worked in two places now with Ruby Sorbet servers. Ruby always drives me nuts how things are just in-scope and we don’t know why or where they came from.
I certainly wouldn’t want to go back to working in dynamic languages without typing on top. That takes too much brain power, I’m too old for that now.
I would say Sorbet seems more “basic” than something like Typescript. It handles function calls matching signatures, potential nulls, making sure properties actually exist, that kind of thing. Whereas TS can get quite abstract, and at times you’re fighting to convince it that a value actually is the type you say it is.
TS is very powerful and expressive, to the point that it’s possible to do computation within type code. I’m not convinced I always need that power, or that it’s always more help than hindrance.
Indeed, if only it were as simple as “{n} rows”.
I18n / l10n is full of things like this, important details that couldn’t be more boring or fiddly to implement.
If I may suggest two artists besides the great Fela Kuti: William Onyeabor (try "Tomorrow") and Dizzy K Falola (try "Sweet Music").
I didn’t see the source graph thing, but the Grab episode always seemed odd to me. He wrote these breathless rants about how epic it all was, then quit after a year or so. I just figured the long hours eventually stopped being awesome.
It would only take you a weekend!
Man, this guy is still doing it. Good for him! I used to read his books (compendia of his syndicated column) when I was a kid.
We have the editor plugin configured so we can see lints in-editor. But the rules are not yet sufficiently configurable for us to use it in CI. It seems they have their own rule-config schema, and it doesn’t expose everything you might need.
For example the banned import rule- you can list specific imports to ban, but you can’t configure a pattern. The actual lint rule supports patterns already but biome’s config doesn’t accept a `pattern` property.
I was with you until “immediate societal collapse”, what?
When I started my career 20 years ago, I thought "they" would figure out how to get a computer to do my job pretty soon. Coders are expensive after all. And I figured I'd just go walk into the woods or something after that; I had no plan for what to do. This is the only thing I'm good at and can make money doing.
Well, it's been 20 years and it hasn't happened yet. Perhaps this will be the year! But not yet.
What is the "emoji hidden message" meant to be testing? This went around about a couple of weeks ago and it's an interesting bug/vuln, I suppose, but why do we care if an LLM catches it?
I agree the criticism is poor; it’s often very lazy. There are currently a lot of dog-brain “wrap a LLM around it” products, which are worthy of scorn. Much of the lazy criticism is pointing at such products and therefore writing off the whole endeavor.
But that doesn’t necessarily reflect the potential of the underlying technology, which is developing rapidly. Websites were goofy and pointless until Amazon came around (or Yahoo or whatever you prefer).
I guess potential isn’t very exciting or interesting on its own.
Don’t start blaming JS people for this AI mess! We’re busy making webpages slow.