doshaa

Which is fine, its a much better situation than the current status quo, If all devs build around steam OS's 'platform' its not that big of a deal for any Linux enthusiast to run in their custom made setup, the main concern is the layman, the enthusiast love these types of problems.

cool

I use better auth for a real app

There is a plugin provided by better auth for jwt https://www.better-auth.com/docs/plugins/jwt

We dont need it since everything is a single "server" and cookies are good enough. JWT would be added complexity ( e.g sign out ) that i find it better to not be set as a default.

bonus reading http://cryto.net/~joepie91/blog/2016/06/19/stop-using-jwt-fo...

I really hope there is like an "AI" flair on projects like these, i love what they aim to do but man the saturation levels mixed with "enough to make it work in theory" effort makes me want to filter out these posts.

I understand its all vibes and fun, but like at least some warnings that "this thing might lag your computer" and buttons that work.

You see it as a problem, i see it as a benefit, Main reason i dislike twitter/X is the amount of pointless grift that goes around, some for monetary reasons, Either behave like a human or leave, "I posted some dog whistle and got banned for it" is actually a great ad for Bluesky.

This is extremely reductive, the asaad regime ( current and previous ) had to go, they've caused immense pain to syrians since the 80s.. The idea that this is some consorted effort by global hegemony to topple them ignores the effort of the rebels themselves, and how much the war in ukraine have costed russia..

The goal here is to scale things to what is needed and in a way that is feasible, i doubt solar panels would've been feasible as a scaling method for energy during that time, much less electric cars, or even less likely, farming strategies and equipment that are ecologically less 'problematic'.

not only that but the destructive nature of it was also wonderful to society overall, our living standards skyrocketed to an unfathomable degree during said revolution.

talking about the ecological destruction -while an important aspect- is irrelevant to the argument of scale to meet people wants and needs.

Think about it this way, would you be talking about the ecological destruction in an 1800s meeting to scale up farming and husbandry efforts to meet the demands of that time?

If the answer is yes, then would you be willing to delay/postpone the efforts until there are better technologies that are more ecologically friendly to exist and then accept/allow these efforts?

If the answer is no, then it is , like i said, irrelevant.

Thats irrelevant.