doganugurlu
One comment claims it’s not necessary to read code when there is documentation (generated by an LLM)
Language varies with geography and with time. British, Americans, and Canadians speak “similar” English, but not identical.
And read a book from 70-80 years ago to see that many words appear to be used for their “secondary meaning.” Of course, what we consider their secondary meaning today was the primary meaning back then.
The OP was right to assume it was lines of code. Another assumption could be number of commits, which also doesn’t measure impact.
/s
You found their homepage. You found that they didn’t ask for money, and allowed you to use their product for free. You decided to use it.
And now, they’re liars. How dare they try to make money?
/s
Or you just decide someone is a communist without talking to them. And your evidence is observing them murder or steal from or starve someone?
You should report these crimes you witness to authorities from time to time.
If we are to assume communists do not out themselves, how do these people find those communists?
I haven’t met a single communist. And I am 40+ and I talk politics with everyone.
I haven’t met a single communist in my life. These delusions people have truly scare me.
Edit: Forgot to mention I’ve also been to Mexico, Jamaica, 2 different states in Brazil, Netherlands, France, England, and Canada. I must repel communists.
“It’s all there Claude just read it.”
Ok…
They don’t do code reviews or any sort of parallel development.
They’re under the impression that “releases are complex and this is how they avoid it” but they just moved the complexity and sacrificed things like parallel work, code reviews, reverts of whole features.
So let’s invert it: what prevents/kills friendships?
- lying (for whatever reason) - talking too much about yourself - not asking people about their lives - being too private - being too judgmental - not empathizing - e.g. someone tells you about something hard they’re experiencing and you change the subject - not caring to help (also showing you don’t care about others that aren’t in your friend-zone) - not offering help - not being kind - not smiling (more like makes it hard for people to approach you)
Most of us want/need friends. Most of us want/need to talk to others about our lives. Someone just moved to where you live. They need a friend. They will strike a conversation w anyone.
Even people in your past probably wanted to be your friend (either coz they thought you were cool or they just needed a friend) - you can still be friends with them. I’ve become friends w people I met long after meeting them.
Asking someone how they are is not so much about the other person. It’s mostly a social ritual. But if no one is asking you how you are, they might also be intimidated by you.
As Aaron Burr would say: talk less, smile more - jk, do more of both.
And why mention that inmates have forfeited their human rights if you see no evidence of abuse? Weird thing to pre-argue.
And that the US populous not only despises these people, but people from both sides of the political spectrum actually want the opposite types as immigrants.
(You are talking about deterring from legal immigration as you have explained in a sibling comment as well, and I am recommending outlawing legal immigration)
I am not against immigration. Though I am not for illegal immigration, nor do I see the need to spend so much money and energy on deportations, while destroying innocent lives, where a standard border many countries maintain every day would suffice.
I struggle to see how you might know so much about these people - whose names we don’t even know - that you can have an opinion about their innocence.
No need to respond if you don’t think you need information to form an opinion. I will assume that.
In fact, some were granted asylum.
/s
That takes an unbelievable a level of dexterity for a 4 year old. Reminds me of those social media posts of 4 year olds saying things that are way beyond the wisdom they may possess.
I call BS.
Your comment is a textbook example of survivorship bias.
Edit:
The sibling comment offers a more concise explanation: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46329213