disntthinkthis
Re:Ask HN: Pro free speech domain registrars?
on Tuesday April 25, 2023 @09:13PM (#35708707)
Fuck off Russian vermin
Re:YouTube, the Jewel of the Internet
on Sunday April 23, 2023 @06:46PM (#35681464)
YouTube has been showing me a ton of channels with low Hundreds of views recently, and they’re very to my taste. Ymmv but they’re doing well at exactly what you’re complaining about in my experience
Re:Navigating the world when your senses conjure up phenomena others c...
on Saturday April 22, 2023 @09:31PM (#35672518)
That sounds severe and so unlike what I’ve experienced. But some amount of noise in vision is normal, you just don’t notice it unless you focus on it, or have a background that really makes it apparently. Light is inherently noisy. If you look at a blank sheet of paper and all you see is #FFFFFF, you’re not paying attention.
Re:I just learned about HTML redirects
on Saturday April 22, 2023 @09:10PM (#35672399)
That’s the modern variation. The original didn’t have any framing like they.
Re:Navigating the world when your senses conjure up phenomena others c...
on Saturday April 22, 2023 @08:20PM (#35672146)
I feel like it’s normal but people just don’t notice. Light is naturally noisy.
Re:Stack Overflow Will Charge AI Giants for Training Data
on Thursday April 20, 2023 @10:13PM (#35649046)
…yet in the same article he’s talking about selling the data to LLM developers.
It’s hard to make sense of.
Re:Stack Overflow Will Charge AI Giants for Training Data
on Thursday April 20, 2023 @08:03PM (#35648201)
Except that Stack Overflow’s CEO, in this very article, says that it’s a violation of the Creative Commons license to train an LLM on their answers. So what he’s actually proposing is very unclear.
> When AI companies sell their models to customers, they “are unable to attribute each and every one of the community members whose questions and answers were used to train the model, thereby breaching the Creative Commons license,” Chandrasekar says.