News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

dgageot

Re:Docker Agent on Wednesday October 07, 2026 @04:39PM (#49998498)
Combination with Codex is indeed not the most common use case around us. I'll see what can be improved. Sorry that it broke your workflow!
Re:Docker Agent on Wednesday October 07, 2026 @04:24PM (#49998319)
Would love to know what didn't work for you
Re:Docker Agent on Wednesday October 07, 2026 @03:55PM (#49998000)
It was created to be the docker compose for agents. 2 years ago, people, including ourselves, started to mix agentic loops and non agentic components in docker compose files. We created docker agent to make this more powerful.

At the end, the link with docker compose is just the yaml form. Which by the way can be replaced with hcl files or Go code.

Re:Docker Agent on Wednesday October 07, 2026 @03:52PM (#49997964)
Docker Agent predates Docker sandboxes. It was created almost two years ago when not everybody had a AI harness. Nowadays, it does run very well in Docker Sandboxes but it runs also very well anywhere you like.
Re:Docker Agent on Wednesday October 07, 2026 @03:50PM (#49997937)
You don't really have to use the docker agent sub-command. docker-agent is a standalone binary. When it was created, though, 1.5 year ago, the idea was that it would be the docker compose for agents (original name was cagent, compose for agents).

But it evolved differently and although it runs very well in docker containers and docker sandboxes, it also runs very well anywhere else.