dfhdshfff
This is how it was phrased:
>(i) Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict;
any native enlgish speaker can read the declaration and see from the contest that it clear that all territories taken during the war are meant.
The Israelis came up with this facetious excuse to try to encroach on more land.
indeed, when one says "Dogs must be kept on the lead near ponds in the park."
it does not mean, for any sane person that some dogs shouldn't be kept on the lead near ponds in the park.
Also:
"it is an accepted rule that the various language versions must be considered together, with the ambiguities of one version elucidated by the other"
Plus, the reason that Israel must give back the territory is the prohibition of acquiring land by force.
If you can't acquire land by force. you can't acquire any land by force. it's illogical for the rule to only apply on some but not all land taken by force.
It is like the infromation doesn't have the time to settle in my memory, despite me understanding it.
It's maybe because when things are slow, I can use the dead time to think about the implication/corner cases of what's being said.
he spoke arabic. Most of his major works were in arabic, in Baghdad. and he has an arabic name.
But if he spoke Enlgish, had an English name, lived his professional life in America. and most of his major works were in Enlgish.
I'd supposed you'd call him an "Anglophone" academic, which is the sense that Arab is used in.
Plus Most of them were not born in Iran proper.