desireco42

What you said 100%, we are brainiacs overhere so our CPU is large

This is such a weird thing that I can't wait to try it out. I don't know, like it's so crazy that it has to be good

They are rewriting those bugs in Rust.

Really hard to make opinion based on few small examples but I can say I like what I see, Ruby like syntax definitely doesn't hurt language.

Multiple return values are kind of weird, but maybe it is just me. Overall this is something I will give a try.

Since I am using Ghostty I can give it a try, it would be nice to see it resolved as it was stupid tbh, all the difficult stuff is working well.

OK, what do you do with a stash like this? I get this is most likely state actor, but what do you do with Bs of money stolen. Do we have any documentaries about that, I think that would be fascinating to see.

I used Zellij in the past, it is also fantastic and intuitive product. I had issues with... I think selection and copying and pasting which made me abandon it as I was getting frustrated. Herdr has been wonderful and I've been using it for a while.

I don't think I need it, but Herdr has been absolutely rock solid for me. And I have this app Pairfob that I can check things up on the phone if I really want to. And while I don't use it quite as often, seems to be more solid then Chatgpt (Codex) and other apps.

I have 2 machines and laptop linked together and running things have never been easier.

But can it run Omarchy :)

Brings back childhood memories...

If you are confused, that is how this company was always been, remember GPT 4, then they did some weird versioning.

I personally like Terra, it kind of does what I would ask Sol or Astra, but dont have to count tokens as much. And Luna has been amazing tbh, it takes designs from prototype and in record time is implementing it, so that was a huge win.

But yeah, they always had confusing way of naming products and if you are not following news, you will be confused about what it is.

Pobeda! Win!

Look this is just a start, but it is great that dissatisfaction that is expressed throughout the Europe, can be expressed in such constructive and clear way in Serbia.

It is cool but since there is no way to confirm ie. run it, or see it working somewhere, it can be also not real.

I get you are excited to share, but taking into account what your product is, it would be more powerful to let people experience it. As a creator of digital products, why would you put so much text on the homepage, anyhow you get the point.

With Jev to make decisions and Ultramarine to produce document manipulations if I understood it correctly, this is pretty useful in office. I would be excited if I was a big corp.

Yeah my agents do spend a little bit more time with it, and I use GLM Flash mostly. Gleam has good error messages which helps a lot. But once they write something it is much more solid.

Shame but also opportunity... These apps will not be good, they will look good and appear to work, but then... they will need to be rewritten.

I am often posting that if you pick Gleam for UI, Rails or Phoenix, which will make your codebase easier to follow and more stable, I will give you discounts.

Legitimate question. In my projects, where I do have a ton of files, but kind of suspect not nearly as you have, I do occasionally instruct agent to review old files and decisions and archive them or delete.

Sometimes it is useful to know how we came about some decision or feature, but in general you often don't need them and they would contain prose that would confuse agent. So you remove it.

I don't use Claude Code mostly because it always loved to generate reports and there is no way I will read it's lengthy reports. I try to have documents I can actually read if I want to.

Hope this helps, but some lifecycle of your documents and requirements is useful to have.

I will just say, as of recently, especially thanks to AI, I've been doing projects in Gleam, I am on third Gleam project and it has been very pleasant experience. It takes longer to write but it is much shorter, easier to follow and much more easier to update and change.

So all we have to do is send telescope right up and let it record...

I will just say that this short movie is something most beautiful I've seen in last several years. To be able to see this, for real, not as a side-effect to the star is absolutely mind blowing.

I think Jev is still the king and while I really appreciate this and other similar projects, Jev gives assurance and value that is hard to beat. Well.. this works locally which is always best, even if slower.

I am confused over this... I get efficiency but price seems too high to me. I didn't try the model, so it migth be beyond fast or some other quality that is not obvious.

Anyone knows more or used this model?

AI will do all our work now, but man at least I lived and wrote Pascal growing up.

Now when I saw their video... ufff, not for me.

Spring 2027 is eternity in the future from today. I love the concept they advertise but by then, there will be so many amazing products and releases.

If they could give me this today and worked somewhat like they promise, even though for $500 or so I can get glasses that do what I need them to do today, for more fidelity I would gladly pay 1k+ they are asking.

I am not sure what will happen till Spring or Summer next year.

I don't need this but this looks very cool. I love neon colors and everything.

Some of these we, dynamic programming is something we didn't do at university and few years ago I did a course to learn it. It is good to know, wish we dealt with more of such intellectual problems at work, but as we all know this is not the case.

Anyhow, really cool.

I tried it on small project. A lot of promising ideas. I don't even care it is so new.

What didn't work for me is the build step. In a bigger project it should be normal to have this but I really love to interactively build and having to restart and rebuild after each change is issue for me.

I was about the ask a question but you just answered how it is built. I guess I will try it out, it sounds really good.

I love your approach, fake testemonials and all.

I have Google Fi, we always had messages.google.com to even get calls, which I never did. Convenient especially because I write longer messages.

Never felt superiour over others for it.

I think you created a potential platform for experiments with different language syntax ideas. It is rarely that people want to change how integers are represented and such, mostly it is syntax. So this lets me and others try things out.