dennisnez
I believe most of what we know about the alleged Holocaust was also from oral testimonies. And I don't think they were cross-examined at all in Nuremberg? Other highly suspicious sources include a young girl's diary.
You sound very biased to assume that only side did propaganda. You have an extremely provocative theory, that the alleged massacres of Katyn and Holodomor didn't happen, very interesting.
It's also quite damning that skepticism of this event has been brutally criminalized.
> Even wikipedia admits it
It's a known thing that Wikipedia (it's inner cadre of editors) has been taken over by commies. It's unreliable when it comes to anything even mildly "political", unfortunately.
Totally unlike The Holocaust or aNnE's dIaRy ;) Those things are obviously totally factual ;).
Katyn and Holodomor etc etc etc are obviously all totally entirely fake fabrications ;). Or well deserved, 'cuz nAzI ;).
You're totally definitely absolutely not biased ;);).
> Even wikipedia admits it
Everyone knows wikipedia has been taken over by commies. It's depressingly unreliable when it comes to anything even mildly "political". You actually sound like one of the editors that I bumped into there. (I'm banned for life, for trying to correct one mild thing on a prominent anti-leftist's page - obviously my edit was banned.)