dcvuob

Any C programmer will recognize what (void)0 means, do nothing.

Sure if you only saw a few lines at a time, then this might be a problem. But you can see 51 on a laptop. This is enough for almost all cases. And you can scroll if you need to look up something. If you stumble upon a case of multiple if statement that span several screens then no style is going to help you see it in full. In that rare case you might see a little more, at the expense of all code ever becoming less readable (if we assume Allman is more readable for the sake of this argument of course).

If for some reason your code has more than, let's say >50% cases where something spans multiple screens and needs to be seen as a whole (code which should be refactored, but let's ignore that), then you might have an argument to use your style, in all other cases you're doing premature optimization of your coding style, so to speak.

    if( condition_a )
    {
         if( condition_b )
         {
             do_thing_a();
         } 
         else 
         {
             do_thing_b();
         }
    } 
    else 
    {
         do_something_else();
    }

The second example is missing error checking. So the real code isn't that nice.

My point is that C shouldn't look like Python. Small amount of functionality should be written unambiguously and take a lot of space if necessary. Because of the nature of C, it needs a lot boilerplate, and will take a lot of screen space anyway, but that is not a problem, as we are not coding on paper.

Voice will need some serious software support if it is going to take off. There is zero chance that users will learn those mnemonics, just as now almost nobody knows how to touch type. The usage will be more in the form of general commands, than specifying every action like we do it now with the keyboard+mouse.

Don't forget to see the entire talk (28 minutes): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SkdfdXWYaI

Here is an excerpt from the pdf: This report does not explore the feasibility of LENR. Instead, it assumes that a working system is available.

Your statement: there are folks at NASA and SPAWAR that think LENR (not fusion per se) is real., is incorrect, they assume it works for the purposes of the discussion about aircraft.

You are either scamming or are being scammed. In the latter case (and I'm trying to help you here), please make an effort with some serious research and re-evalaute your opinions.

The page even explains this:

https://github.com/carmaa/inception#awesome-but-why

https://github.com/carmaa/inception#unlock