dbergamin
It is hard to say, as the requirement you have doesn't sound very standard so we might need to know a bit more to help.
Half-arsing carries negative connotations - to me, at least, it is the 'bad' form of pragmatism, and as such in my book it is never defensible.
IMO we have other words to describe the scenario where an expert consciously makes a 'good' or reasonable trade-off to complete a task in a smaller window of time, and should use those instead.
Perhaps reasonable in projects/tasks that you have full ownership of and intend to continue to do so for the foreseeable future. In general though, I think there's good reason to strongly prefer the 'if a thing is worth doing, it's worth doing well' side of the spectrum.
Fair response IMO, this is the type of issue that can attract a lot of noisy opinions so very reasonable to lock comments to contributors.
Principle 1 on the Jekyll philosophy is 'no magic', and that's why I love it. It tends to behave as expected, and what it provides is simple enough that I maintain a feeling of full control over the output. I've wrote some little bits of JS to add minor client-side enhancements, and the Jekyll plugin system is easy to dive into if you want to add some site-render features. Great tool.
Kudos to the author for putting something up for discussion. Replace the word 'The' with 'My' in the title and it's a nice exploration of where React tooling for static sites is at.
Keep publishing and sharing mate, you're good at telling a story and have more good content ahead of you.
For a permanent hire I think it would be reasonable to ask more than half. Even working 50% hours, one does not usually completely unplug during other half - even if not active on corporate systems it's likely they're taking problems away and thinking them over.
I think you may be surprised by the output you get - when I have worked with part time technical staff in the past, it often seems to help grant a laser focus of sorts.