News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

db579

Re:Matrix Conference 2025 Highlights on Tuesday October 21, 2025 @11:00AM (#45656664)
Is Element One not being offered anymore? Will existing users continue to be supported?
Re:Matrix v1.15 Release on Friday June 27, 2025 @02:10PM (#44398944)
Appreciate the response, that's great to hear.
Re:Matrix v1.15 Release on Friday June 27, 2025 @03:32AM (#44394550)
It's a little frustrating that Element X is constantly pitched as the answer when it isn't yet supported by Element's own EMS One hosted service.
Re:Matrix.org Will Migrate to MAS on Thursday April 03, 2025 @04:07AM (#43566418)
Arathorn I'm a bit confused that Element pushes Element X so much already when your own Element One service doesn't support it yet?
Re:Google is already pushing WEI (web DRM) into Chromium on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @03:18PM (#36883388)
Google can also decide at any time to put those web properties behind forced logins, or paywalls or just shutter them altogether. If Google doesn't want them to be part of the open web they won't be, regardless of whether this particular set of things is implemented or not. If we're all dependent on them enough that that's a problem for us, then that dependency is the problem.
Re:UK: Excess deaths in 2022 among worst in 50 years on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @04:31PM (#34331815)
I think this is a common framing because not everyone is aware that GPs are independent private businesses. We always refer to them as "part of the NHS" as if they were (or at least should be) equivalent to each other.
Surely that vision is exactly what (vanilla) Gnome is? On Desktop and on Mobile (with LibAdwaita). Incidentally they also seem to get a lot of criticism for having a strong vision.
Re:Rust front-end merged in GCC trunk on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @01:15PM (#33987390)
Also artichoke ruby https://www.artichokeruby.org/
Re:Patreon Lays off 17% of Staff on Tuesday September 13, 2022 @02:32PM (#32828429)
Those are things the company is doing to take responsibility, not him personally which is what his statement should imply.
It's the worst software I use on a day to day basis and it's not close. Granted that's on Linux which likely isn't Microsoft's main focus but still nothing else does this much this badly.
Experience with Rails and Hotwire has been very positive so far.
Do any cab companies here let you book online via browser/PWA rather than requiring a proprietary app to be downloaded? Uber used to have m.uber.com but it seems lately that doesn't actually allow you to book rides in this region anymore and I've not come across any others yet.
Re:PinePhone Pro Announced on Friday October 15, 2021 @07:21PM (#28884245)
This exists and is probably the closest thing to trying to do that. Stalled out well short of millions though...

https://puri.sm/fund-your-app/

Re:PinePhone Pro Announced on Friday October 15, 2021 @06:50PM (#28884047)
Element.io also offer paid managed servers where they do the bridging for you if you'd rather not deal with it yourself. Starts at around $10 a month for a home server plus some light WhatsApp bridging and works surprisingly well, with the caveats already mentioned above about calling.
Re:PinePhone Pro Announced on Friday October 15, 2021 @11:13AM (#28878591)
Really depends how you define the task doesn't it? If it's "I have the ability to message other people" there's plenty of ways to accomplish that on this device. If you define the task as "I need to message other people specifically on a Google/Apple messenger application", well then it's always going to be out of Pine64s hands to some extent?
Starling do offer an API anyone can use to interact with their own account. Doesn't allow full functionality yet though.
Re:Sublime Text 4 on Saturday May 22, 2021 @06:14AM (#27245148)
Would you ever consider a licensing model similar to Cockroach DBs BSL where older versions fall into the public domain/are open sourced once they're no longer revenue generating? Or perhaps once a new major version is out?
Re:Trapped priors as a basic problem of rationality on Sunday March 14, 2021 @08:38AM (#26454823)
I think this is often confused because "works" is poorly defined leading both sides to interpret it as: works == achieves my aims == matches my values
Re:Big name corporations more likely to commit fraud: study on Saturday February 06, 2021 @11:32AM (#26047607)
> just because a negative emergent behavior manifested doesn't mean any one person had to have taken an action rising to the level of criminal culpability.

If that is true (and I think it is) I would argue the law is wrong. It should absolutely be the case that senior executives have criminal liability for criminal behaviours that emerge under their stewardship whether or not they personally contributed to them. Either they knew about it in which case they're complicit or they didn't in which case they're negligent. The risk of criminal liability is also the only possible justification for the high current level of CEO pay relative to average salaries at most big name companies.

Yep, in Europe inter-bank transfers are also instant and if the underlying reason for all these regulations, confusions and trading impact is that US institutions have just been too cheap to upgrade the legacy infrastructure running the biggest store and exchange of value in the world then frankly surprise and anger seems justified.
Re:Why Robinhood disabled buys but not sells on Sunday January 31, 2021 @01:00PM (#25980887)
If that's genuinely the case then it's no wonder people are angry. At the scale of money involved legacy tech just shouldn't be an acceptable excuse.
Re:Why Robinhood disabled buys but not sells on Sunday January 31, 2021 @12:55PM (#25980831)
Would also like to know the answer to this. From the amount of people explaining the nuance of the deposit rules it seems many people expect trading to work the way you've described. The fact that it (counterintuitively?) doesn't seems like it might be a flaw in the system.
Re:Why Robinhood disabled buys but not sells on Sunday January 31, 2021 @12:32PM (#25980583)
It may well be that it does take payment processors t+2 days but I think the point remains that it should not.
OK so as a none techie why is it not genuinely instant? Why can't my cash be exchanged for the stock in real time (where real time is defined as within a minute or two say).
Arguably yes. I'm not saying it's necessarily the world I would want to live in but I suspect the world's aggregate perceived level of happiness may be higher.
Some projects I've donated to this year, either directly or via donating to their developers.

OpenStreetMap Wikipedia DAVx5 Jellyfin Mobian Thunderbird PureMaps Sequeler rust-gtk

Re:Librem 5 Evergreen vs. Pinephone on Monday December 07, 2020 @07:55PM (#25340081)
It's only ~2.5x the cost of the Made in China version. I'm intrigued that you think it could be done for less?

Given that no one currently is and that the average salary in the US appears to be about double the average in China - that seems about right?

Re:Librem 5 Evergreen vs. Pinephone on Monday December 07, 2020 @07:30PM (#25339802)
Because you have to start somewhere and by paying $2k today for a few screws inserted in the USA you hopefully prove the demand for full manufacturing to be supplied in the USA. And hopefully not just in the USA, centralising the entire worlds manufacturing capacity in one region is not particularly anti-fragile.
Are you able to give any rough indication of when a Linux client might be available? Are we talking months, years etc?

Also do you have a pricing strategy in mind yet for when this moves out of beta? (Sorry if I missed that on the site)

Re:Apple Silicon M1: A Developer's Perspective on Saturday November 28, 2020 @01:06PM (#25239199)
That's even worse. Accidentally disagreeing with my values would be one thing but doing it on purpose... beyond the pale!

Older »