darthcoder1010
I agree, that implementation is definitely flawed. Probably the author do not consider that important a proper hashtable.
> looks like the immature and arrogant opinion of someone completely unaware of his ignorance.
This is what I'm referring to when I say "harsh" criticism. Maybe he is wrong, but I think there are better ways of saying it: "Hey, maybe a proper hashtable is not that easy.. have you consider [insert here improvement proposal]?"
Certainly.
Since the announce of Hare I've seen __too__ much criticism IMHO.
I think the authors have stated clearly the intentions and the features of the language: They just want a slightly better C. Of course you may not like it, but no need to be that harsh...
Don't get me wrong, I appreciate the quality of the Linux desktop of today, but I don't see anything really different from Windows/Mac apart from getting subpar support from many software/hardware vendors.
Maybe is just nostalgia, or maybe I'm growing old and grumpy...
A typical distorted though is over-generalization. For instance: if a depressed person fails to pass an exam, he may think that he will never be able to pass that exam and his life is a complete failure because of that. Of course that though is NOT the reality. The reality is that he probably need prepare better for that exam, but that does not mean that his life is a complete failure.
If someone is interested in this topic I recommend the book "Feeling good" by David Burns.