daquisu
I can't help much more than that, I did that research in the last few days, but I never used Grok myself.
I pay for GPT, Claude and Gemini. Last week I consumed all my quota on two of them, so I wondered which next subscription I would pay for if needed.
It is the same multiplier for Sol with subscription. For Astra though the multiplier is ≈20x, so half of Sol usage.
For Claude it seems to be ≈40x too for Opus, but less for Fable (similar to Astra in GPT).
All on the most expensive plan. Previously, Grok usage escalated linearly from the $100 plan to $300 plan. That would be a really good $100 plan if it is still true.
Some sources:
1. https://x.com/kunchenguid/status/2098256018836963382
2. https://x.com/stevenzhang/status/2092110386569089311
3. https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/43731
- Ozempic For Sleep https://www.isaak.net/sleepless/ (November 2024)
It is the same author from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41742432
He recently founded https://capable.com, also related
> We can also consider the IMO 2025 problems individually. In the Epoch AI newsletter, Greg Burnham combines a subjective analysis with Evan Chen’s MOHS ratings to argue that the first five problems at IMO 2025 were unusually easy and the sixth was unusually hard, so it’s not surprising that the first five problems were exactly the ones solved by these AIs. Though I’m not sure the MOHS scale is rigorous enough to make sense as the x-axis of a bar chart it’s easy to corroborate the high-level story with the official IMO statistics. Based on average scores, this year’s Problem 6 was the fourth hardest and its Problem 3 was by far the easiest of all Problem 3s and 6s since 2000.
In the linked MaxProof paper, in the section "6.3.1. Per-Problem Analysis" it shows the same behavior: 7/7 in the first 5 problems, 0/7 in the last problem.
Crudely, IMO gold medals are awarded to the highest-scoring 1/12 of contestants.1 However, because scores are integers up to 42 and there’s no provision for tiebreaking, it’s possible for a lot of contestants to be tied around the threshold. In that case, either all of them get a gold medal or none do, and the fraction of gold medalists might deviate substantially from 1/12. That’s what happened this year: 46 contestants all won a gold medal by scoring exactly 35 points.
In fact, bizarrely, 35 is the mode of the scores this year; the last time the modal score was a gold medal score was in 1994. And, of course, 35 is the same score claimed by AI systems from Google, OpenAI, and others."
Anecdata, but it weirdly helped me. Seemed BS for me until I tried.
Maybe because good code is contextual? Sample codes to explain concepts may be simpler than a production ready code. The model may have the capability to do both but can't properly disguished the correct thing to do.
I don't know.
From my POV Google could have released a good B2C LLM before OpenAI, but it would compete with their own Ads business.
For more advanced CSP bypass with extension, you can:
1. Inject JS code into any webpage with a CSP.
2. Create an event listener for your content script and reacting according to it.
3. Use your content script to communicate with the background script.
4. Use the background script to communicate with any website, including blocked websites by the CSP.
Basically, any website <-> extension content script <-> background script <-> any website.
One professor of mine commented that most French engineers are better mathematicians than most mathematicians in Brazil.
It is the opposite of what the linked article mentions that was happening in Weierstrass' time.
It also has two screens and its own stand, I use it as my travel machine.
For people with native or fluent English, for sure. For the others, probably not.
> When everyone else can, why can’t you just enjoy a drink or two, and be part of the group for a few hours?
Apart from the hearing loss, maybe you are an introvert and just prefer more quiet enviroments. Nothing is wrong with that, there is no need to feel you must go out because of peer pressure, and no need to wait until you have a hearing loss to have an excuse to stop going. It is better to find other people who are introverts than eternally trying to adapt to be something you may not want.
> At some point it stops making sense, having done it repeatedly with the same outcome.
If you find purpose in doing something, then you don't do it because of different outcomes. Maybe you didn't find purporse in going out from the beginning?
(Ideally) short code snippets, discussion about what it solves, reviews possibly with other alternatives, discussions about tradeoffs...
Just like you, I think IQ is very trainable. It is very common to have questions about logic, which may be represented as Venn Diagrams, or visual questions with multiple parts, each one following a logic...
<appeal to authority> I say that as someone who "started" with 110 QI according to a Orkut online test, and grinded my way to 145 according to different online tests. </appeal to authority>
For that reason people who learned how to prove things in math are naturally going to have a higher IQ: they learned how to solve some questions in the test.
Competitive games in general feel like STEM olympiads: you have an objective ranking, you have challenges, you have competitition. You deal with hard problems related to performance: how to keep improving? Which topics are hard for me?
It was crazily important for my personal development, but as with olympiads, eventually there isn't a lot of new things to learn, at least things that you will carry with you for life.
But good you at least opened the link and raised the question, there a lot of people here supposing it is a blocker to be more productive.
That's funny because India has also over a billion more people than the U.S., but the U.S is ranked 3rd by population. This means that even if US got 1 billion more people, they would still be the ranked 3rd by population
In my case no. I started with -2.5 for myopia, and was squinting pretty hard for a few months before that. Had no astigmatism
Then I got a bad habit of scratching my eyes whenever I slept too little time. While this happened my astigmatism increased by 0.25 D each year, for 4 years in a row