danishanish

I think the cooling mass is so expensive and fragile that it’s basically an unsolved problem.

If most of their revenue was fraudulent it doesn’t prove anything. I’m not saying it’s proof against, but it’s definitely not proof for, either.

I mean, surely when quality is accounted for the difference is significantly higher

Your most recent comment is “This.”

I don’t imagine a model capable of the first part would require being told not to assume a decipherment is correct

It is such a colossal self-report (when meant).

At least there’s positives there…

It’s not blunting a tool, it’s sheathing it. Modern software requires too much proxied trust for this attitude to work.

I think I’m missing something. Financially, what bag would the memory makers be holding here? I don’t think I’m well informed regarding how these deals were structured.

I think it saves labor and eventual bug hunting to include these in a stdlib. We should not be expected to look up the UUIDv4 spec and make sure you’re following it correctly. This feels like exactly what reasonable encapsulation should be.