dana-s

As individual as dating is, I agree with checking for this, I'd rather not spend my time with someone whom had such past

The people in my life who have kids had them by accident, none were planning for it to actually happen.

Does the current USA smell democratic to you? Are the powers there working or just even more generalised corruption?

I believe the parent comment is talking about leaving US, coming back to the US and then having US's border patrol do so. If that is also what you understood, are you an activist or anyone whom would be of interest to the feds to be asked so? Otherwise saying "I've never been asked" sounds like a common thing for most people.

It's now a CAPTCHA to tell humans apart from bots based on how you write.

"build the future" meaning build a very specific form of future, which not everyone would rather be part of.

Yeah, just like how having regulations for mining companies and dams, if one of them fails and destroys the environment? Progress!

I don't see much issue with FLINTA spaces, other than it still failing at the ye old question "how to easily filter bad people from people". The options for regular spaces are still HUGE, some people deciding to have FLINTA and apparently enjoying themselves is a plus.

That last piece of data is one that frightened me when visiting a museum there. There's a lot of horrible things that may still as well be ongoing for all I know.

Is a package branded if it has a sticker on it? Is it branded if it's got a print on the outside? If it has a tape that has the brand on it? Because all these cases have happened to smaller shops I buy from.

One has a tape on regular boxes that is branded

Other has stickers on the packages to identify it

And one has a small branded plastic packaging.

I doubt any of them is bringing home more than 500k EUR in revenues per year(giving a very safe margin there)

I've seen how low the bar is within my family, it can go lower than the bar I've personally seen, it scares me.

I believe the cat and rat game is already there, for multiple places, spam, captchas and now for AI content, yes, it's objective is to make it harder for AI companies to get such data, if it wastes their time, it's a win.

And you still did not answer the question posed in the first place, "omnipotent" is completely deflecting any possibility of that happening, when the issue happened over a holiday, time that is prime for issues, take for example, Christmas markets attacks on Germany. While yes, it's speculation "today", I've asked in the main question.

I don't believe this is victim blaming, it's clear that what hamas did is unforgivable, my previous post states so, then again, you'd not be a good parent if you let your child go to Epstein island knowing what will happen to it, yes, the victims are still victims, same as the Christmas market but the government is failing it's population, when it otherwise is capable of taking measures for it.

This all said, I'll stop engaging with you as I've had enough to debate against a "throw" account.

And when we both get a bit older, it may come to light that a state leader let this happen, hopefully history will show reality for what it was.

Still, that doesn't absolve Hamas from any actions done, they are terrorists at it's core and the worst type, they are willing to use civilians(and babies) to further their agenda, I don't condone them and personally and think the world would be a better place without them(as any other extremist)

Explain to me like I'm 5, how a nation capable of such propaganda to install bombs in communication devices, hacked to be bought by leaders of terrorist organizations, capable of bombing the leader of Iran did NOT know about this attack? And if they did know, didn't do anything to prepare for it?

Because the best product should still take care of some social accountability, Meta would not sell their shitty glasses without the light indicator and even with it, as it's trivial to hack there's large social pushback.

The USA is also currently signalling hostilities towards Brazil. They're hostile to all.

I'm also not the most smart there but there's this market thing of "futures", where I can say I'll buy 10 barrels for 10$ next month, then I can sell the "10 barrels for 10$" to others, if I know offer will be lower due wars, one can buy now and sell once it's lower, if it's going to have higher availability(or expectation of so), then there's those future things.

the resting points are disappearing and so are humans, if we look at the natality rates.

A second or third time?

I believe it's from the reported usage of it to undress children(making realistic images that are pretty much CSAM or CSAM-like), which was allowed in the public version of grok and seen in twitter, now it's behind grok pro but still able to generate such. That's from memory so some aspects may be wrong.

Nope, the claim is that "harm to children" is a political topic. One that is used by all political parties.

Erm, isn't the whole topic of "protect the kids" pretty much a political thing? As could be interpreted of a platform or app or whatever you wanna call generating CSAM?

Or even just setting up a timer, I've set up a 20 min timer for myself recently, once it's done I do stick to it, I did get to do some things I've been pushing away, I still get some value out of these but... I get a lot more by not spending an hour on them.

I'm just left wondering, how would that be different than buying a phone? Most kids also don't have money to spend on devices, that's all coming from adults, how would the UUID work any different? In my view it seems we'll just reach the current state as with phones.

The idea of capping wealth is to cap power imbalance, without power imbalance many things would not be able to happen within a system, alas there are as you say many potential side effects, implementations of how a cap could work would have to be discussed by society, right now I do feel people are very mad about inequality as is, what solutions are there for it?

Talking with an American trying to sell me on "don`t use deepseek because of moral reasons" really made me much more invested in China.

If there's no cap on a ceiling, is it fair or humanly okay when someone's wealth is Epstein-enough to own other people's lives? Wealth is a proxy for power, when someone has more power than legal systems or enough to swindle all of it, is that a better world?

There should be a ceiling or we reach the current state where accountability is nothing a million dollars can't buy.

You were correct, it got flagged. Personally I held the belief that people shat too much on the USA, then the current regime started and I feel a fool.

> In my country > Your depiction of a person with downs is not representative of the majority.

It may be for a different country, both experiences are valid to hear. In my country as far as I know it doesn't happen like yours.