crustygirl
let's say you were optimizing something to be pretty A, delicious B, soft C.
you tune the system and evaluate the prettiness, deliciousness and softness.
you tuned it several times and got three products (A, B, C) of (1,2,3), (2,1,3), (3,2,1) - concrete values are correct evaluations. how exactly do you choose the best one, is prettiness more important?
pareto efficiency come to mind - also discussed in the article. [1]
Baby cows can be traumatized by separation from their mother and scarred for life. Cows are also mourning the loss of their best friends for a long time. Many other animals that human use for agriculture clearly fit the description of sentient beings that have a "wish" to live.
Robert Lustig's bitter truth is a complete lie.
Fact-checking bunch of his "extraordinary" statements, like those about Japanese not consuming fructose, and similar, points that he has an agenda to share.
as I've said before, problem is overconsumption of everything and animal products take a huge part of that 3500kcal intake.
reducing intake of calorically dense foods is a good step towards battling the rise of killer diseases since most of them are obviously caused by unhealthy lifestyle.
Although eating animals that do not have a central nervous system is equivalent to eating plants, so it should be vegan.
GMO could easily solve the problem of omega-3 and B12. [2]
[1]: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9637947
[2]: http://www.gmo-compass.org/eng/database/plants/63.rapeseed.h...
3500kcal per person per day 150kg of meat per person per year (compared to chinese of 60kg, or world average of 40kg).
overconsumption is the word. there was not a hint of criticism of meat being "unhealthy" -- it was mentioned in the frame of overconsumption.