News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

covzzire

Re:FCC Passes Strict Net Neutrality Regulations on 3-2 Vote on Thursday February 26, 2015 @02:27PM (#9114756)
Why couldn't we just get congress to pass a law stating that ISP's cannot throttle one type of content in favor of another? Why this heavy handed approach?
Re:FCC Passes Strict Net Neutrality Regulations on 3-2 Vote on Thursday February 26, 2015 @02:21PM (#9114695)
The FCC"s plan isn't NN. It's a gigantic steaming pile of regulations that's ostensibly designed to implement NN. So far, any attempts at public debate gets reduced to emotional screeches and partisanship without any real meat to anything.

We're doomed. Maybe not today, tomorrow or next year, but censorship as you fear it is coming and you have yourselves to blame.

Re:FCC Passes Strict Net Neutrality Regulations on 3-2 Vote on Thursday February 26, 2015 @02:14PM (#9114635)
I like how you refuted my points with logic and reason and didn't try to cop out via some lame method like clicking a green link.
Re:FCC Passes Strict Net Neutrality Regulations on 3-2 Vote on Thursday February 26, 2015 @01:58PM (#9114461)
Nobody is against NN. Nobody wants the internet to be less free. The problem here is that the FCC is detonating a nuclear bomb to try to put out a house fire. It's completely unnecessary and will do more harm than good.
Re:FCC Passes Strict Net Neutrality Regulations on 3-2 Vote on Thursday February 26, 2015 @01:56PM (#9114434)
Ars has been playing on the 'Republicans are against it so it must be good' emotion card for awhile now. That's almost all I see on this issue in the tech media. What's been happening is that all objections are being dismissed as "Republicans lol" and "Fox News reporting so must be wrong". Our national discussion is literally at the level of Jon Stewart's mockery of things that warrant serious discussion.