couldwejust
Re:Could We Just Lose the Adverb (Already)?
on Monday May 23, 2016 @07:19PM (#11757773)
"to" just doesn't make much sense. In a geometric sense, the writing isn't directed, the sending is. The writing is adressed, sure but towards doesn't fit, while it's correct to just adress someone. Just sending someone would be different. With writing, it's underspecified, because there is no "writing someone [down]" :)
In german, write me and write to me also work both, but these are the different grammatical cases dativ and akusativ. There are only four and I'm guessing here. They require the different forms "mir" or "[an] mich". These cases are called the same in english, correct me if I'm wrong.
Re:Fizz Buzz in Tensorflow
on Monday May 23, 2016 @06:51PM (#11757661)
> what if someone provided Fizz Buzz in COQ or Elixir
Wie waere es fuer dich, wenn ich in einer Sprache antworte, die du wahrscheinlich nicht verstehst?
Re:Could We Just Lose the Adverb (Already)?
on Monday May 23, 2016 @06:08PM (#11757446)
> I found this read awkward. The writing does not demonstrate the qualification to offer advice on writing style. If that was supposed it is good.
Fixed, because your comment on quality does not convince me with its quality.
edit: See how that slightly changed the meaning to be more clear, but perhaps not what you meant? And awkward looks arkward.